Diagnostic Imaging Members: Login | Register

Diagnostic Imaging
    About Us

TOPIC CENTERS


MORE INFO



Home » Conference Reports » RSNA 2008 » Breast Imaging

DiagnosticImaging.com.
 

Gamma imaging picks up cancer unseen by mammograms

By Kristin Minogue | December 3, 2008

Out of every 10 women whose mammogram or physical exam reveals potentially cancerous cells in their breasts, approximately three of them will have additional dangerous clusters the examinations missed, according to a recent study presented at the RSNA conference Wednesday.

Breast-specific gamma imaging can detect cancer cells that escape the notice of mammograms and physical exams, said lead author Dr. Rachel Brem, a professor of radiology at The George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, DC.

The danger is even greater for women who have dense breasts that can mask the presence of cancer, a category that encompasses more than half of women under 50, Brem said.

Brem's team of researchers examined the records 159 women who underwent breast-specific gamma-imaging after their mammograms or clinical exams revealed one or more suspicious or cancerous lesions. Gamma imaging revealed at least one more suspicious lesion in 29% of them.

The technique uses a different approach from traditional mammograms.

"They're anatomic approaches to breast cancer detection. They ask, what does breast cancer look like?" Brem said. "But what if you could fundamentally look at breast cancer from a different perspective? What if you could say, ‘how does breast cancer function differently from the normal surrounding breast tissue?'"

To detect potentially dangerous cells using gamma imaging, the physician injects technetium-99m-sestamibi into the patient's arm. Cancer cells, due to their high metabolic activity, absorb much more of the substance than normal cells. This sends up a red flag for doctors looking for signs of danger.

At least half the occult cancers detected in this study were smaller than 1 cm, but Brem said gamma imaging can detect early lumps as small as 1 mm.

Although this radiotracer has been used for over 10 years, Brem said its ability to unearth additional cancers could affect how women receive treatment.

She also said it could be particularly helpful for patients with diabetes, a disease that can pose problems for the positron emission mammography (PEM). But she warned that gamma imaging should not be seen as a replacement for mammograms.

"This will not obviate the need for either mammography or tomosynthesis," she said, referring to an x-ray technique also used to detect breast cancer.

Brem estimated the equipment costs approximately $250,000, and the radiotracer roughly $75. More than 80,000 patients in the U.S. have used BSGI to date, according to Brem.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





RSNA 2008 Breast Imaging

Breast ultrasound scanner debuts in Siemens RSNA booth
December 5, 2008

Siemens Healthcare unveiled a breast ultrasound system at RSNA 2008 whose automated exams could help women’s health practitioners achieve the potential of ultrasound as a complement to mammography.

Siemens dedicates MR scanner to breast
December 5, 2008

Siemens underscored its commitment to women’s health with its introduction at RSNA 2008 of Espree Pink, a 1.5T scanner dedicated to breast imaging.

Digital stereotaxy adds to GE digital mammo
December 4, 2008

An add-on digital stereotaxy option for GE’s Senographe Essential lets users perform biopsies on its full-field digital mammography system, sparing institutions the expense of setting up a dedicated biopsy room, according to the company.

Gamma imaging picks up cancer unseen by mammograms
December 3, 2008

Out of every 10 women whose mammogram or physical exam reveals potentially cancerous cells in their breasts, approximately three of them will have additional dangerous clusters the examinations missed, according to a recent study presented at the RSNA conference Wednesday.

Breast-specific gamma imaging shows better sensitivity than other methods
December 3, 2008

Breast-specific gamma imaging demonstrates better specificity and sensitivity than mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, according to several studies presented at the RSNA meeting.

Automated breast ultrasound identifies nonexistent breast cancer lesions
December 3, 2008

Automated breast ultrasound should not replace handheld ultrasound in a diagnostic breast center but rather should be used in conjunction with it or play a role in screening breast ultrasound, according to a study presented at the 2008 RSNA meeting.

New mammography technique avoids limitations of older technology
December 3, 2008

Strengths of tomosynthesis could hinder its adoption
December 3, 2008

While radiologists herald breast tomosynthesis as the hope for the future of breast imaging, several barriers hinder its widespread use. Its very ability to detect benign lesions dilutes the value of such detection, according to a keynote speech at the RSNA meeting.

Toshiba introduces breast MR suite
December 2, 2008

Extending its reach in applications for MR in women’s health, Toshiba unveiled at RSNA 2008 its Radiance Plus Breast Imaging Suite for use on the company’s two 1.5T scanners, the Vantage Atlas and Vantage Titan.

PACSGEAR unveils mammo digitizer
December 2, 2008

As the mammography community embraces digital mammography, newly converted sites must overcome the challenge of comparing new images with old. PACSGEAR introduced at RSNA 2008 its solution to the problem.







CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy