DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • Voice Recognition
  • Low Dose
  • RSNA 2011
  • PET-MR

Home » Conference Reports » SIIM 2006

NewsFromSIIM2006

SIIM 2006


View slide show

SIIM2006


 

Computer simulation predicts impact of equipment on PACS

Greg Freiherr
April 30, 2006

Hospitals typically add or upgrade scanners to their radiology departments without considering how the new equipment will affect PACS performance. Some administrators argue that there is no other way to do it. But Sergio Camorlinga, Ph.D., research and development manager of TRLabs in Winnipeg, Canada, may have found a better way.

In a presentation Saturday at the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine meeting, Camorlinga outlined how one or more PCs can be used to simulate equipment planned for future installation. The PCs are programmed to transmit to the network the type and amount of data likely to be generated by the new equipment additions.

"You can simulate all of the scanners you want in one computer, or you can put a computer in each place where you would be installing a new scanner, so you have a realistic view of their impact on the network," he said.

Camorlinga and colleagues developed and tested such a prototype on a simulated network, producing graphs of data loads placed on the PACS. The prototype tool, or slave, is programmed to generate specific amounts of data at certain times throughout the day. A master node built into the PACS gauges the effect on data transfer times.

"Say we want to add a new CT scanner and we know that this scanner will produce a new case every 10 minutes," he said. "We can configure this in the slave and simulate the transfers."

The best, worst, and average performances of the PACS are then plotted against a set of data loads pushed onto the network. The analysis can form the basis of a plan to smooth the process of future installations.

"The idea is that if you notice an impact on the other users, you can see how to upgrade the network and maybe minimize the impact," he said.

The impact of new hardware on the network is the most immediate application, but computers might also be programmed to judge the effects of changing conditions within the network. One example is a physical reorganization marked by changing the locations of scanners or workstations.

"With this tool, administrators can see if the transfer time statistics are within tolerance parameters for the hospital," he said. "This will tell them quickly if the network has to be changed, which in the end can save time and money."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





What'sNewonDiagnosticImaging.com


So, Imaging Technologist, You Want to Be Considered a Medical Professional
February 10, 2012
MRI Technique Shows Success of MS Drug Copaxone
February 9, 2012
Early CT Angiography Identifies Recurrent Stroke Risk
February 9, 2012
Podcast: Using MRI in the Operating Room
February 8, 2012
PET with FDG May Predict Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
February 8, 2012


CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy