DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • CT
  • Low Dose
  • PET/MR
  • RSNA 2011
  • HIMSS 2012

Home » Topics » IMRT

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 16 No. 1
 

IMRT of the Breast Markedly Reduces Moist Desquamation

January 1, 2007

PHILADELPHIA—In a randomized trial, breast cancer patients who underwent postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) had a markedly reduced incidence of moist desquamation and overall skin toxicity, compared with those receiving standard radiation therapy. Jean-Philippe Pignol, MD, PhD, reported the results at the 48th annual ASTRO meeting (plenary 1).

Furthermore, the unexpectedly rapid accrual of patients into the study indicates that "skin toxicity is very important to our patients," said Dr. Pignol, of Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre. An additional surprising finding was the high incidence of moist desquamation at 6 weeks, compared with previous studies that have followed patients for shorter intervals. This finding indicates a need to extend the customary period of follow-up after treatment.

Moist desquamation is known to develop at the location of radiation "hot spots," particularly in the inframammary fold. IMRT has been shown to result in a more uniform dose distribution than standard two-field radiation therapy with wedge compensation, but the clinical implications of this greater uniformity were not known. Dr. Pignol's study found large reductions in grade 2-4 skin toxicity and in moist desquamation in patients receiving IMRT.

The study enrolled 358 patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with local excision. The target enrollment was reached in 20 months, well ahead of the planned 3-year accrual period. Patients were randomly assigned to receive postoperative IMRT or standard wedge radiation, at doses of 50 Gy, with or without a 16-Gy boost. Randomization was stratified by breast size and boost.

Breast IMRT was associated with a 17% reduction in moist desquamation occurring at any location on the breast (31% vs 48% for wedge therapy, P = .002) and specifically in the inframammary crease (26% vs 43%, P = .001). Differences in grade 3-4 skin toxicity between groups were not significant, possibly owing to the variability in measuring these outcomes. But overall grade 2-4 toxicity was reduced by nearly 75% in patients receiving IMRT.

Risk of skin toxicity was related to breast size, with a threefold increase in incidence between women with small- and medium-size breasts and another threefold increase between medium and large. Skin toxicity was also related to the peak radiation dose received and to the sagittal gradient, a measure of the uniformity of radiation distribution in the sagittal plane. In a multivariate analysis, significant predictors of skin toxicity were the radiation method used and breast size.

The incidence of moist desquamation, almost 50% in the group receiving standard therapy, was surprisingly high, compared with previously reported rates of 20% to 38%, Dr. Pignol said. Only about half of cases occurred within the first few weeks of follow-up. This observation indicates that "moist desquamation is more frequent than expected and is often delayed," he said. In follow-up questionnaires, he noted, patients indicated that grade 2-4 moist desquamation was associated with increased pain and a poorer quality of life.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Vantage Point

Days of 2D Treatment Planning Are Over

LORI J. PIERCE, MD — This study provides evidence that the days of 2D planning for all patients with breast cancer should be over," said Dr. Pierce, professor of radiation oncology and associate provost for faculty affairs, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. Treatment planning should be individualized based on body habitus, she said. "We've come a long way in the treatment of breast cancer," she said. "We have achieved excellent rates of in-breast tumor control with 2D planning. Now we are trying to maintain those rates while decreasing complications with 3D treatment planning and delivery and IMRT." Future outcome studies should focus on decreasing not only acute effects but long-term complications of radiotherapy, she said.

Dr. Pierce noted that "the results of Dr. Pignol's study do not imply that 5- to 9-segment IMRT should be recommended specifically for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in all patients." Other techniques, such as 3D treatment planning with lung correction, and 3D with forward planned segments, or IMRT using beamlets, can also deliver a uniform dose distribution, she said. "I think that improved dose homogeneity throughout the breast is what should be recommended, no matter what it takes to get there," Dr. Pierce concluded.






TopicIndex

 

ACOs
Cardiac
Case Studies
Colonography
CT
Digital X-ray
Direct Radiography
Elastography
Low-Dose Modalities
Meaningful Use
Molecular Imaging
MRI
 

 

Nuclear
PACS
PET/CT
PET/MR
Practice Management
RIS
Teleradiology
Ultrasound Imaging
Vendors
Voice Recognition
Women's Imaging
All Topics
 


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is the key to leading the next generation of coding technology for radiology


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 


FromPhysiciansPractice

Physician Performance Goals Are Great, But Balance Is More Realistic
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 15, 2012
Performance measurements for physicians are well-intentioned and get me to rethink how I practice. But in the end I won't make the goals, so I'll have to go with balance over perfection.
Designing the Perfect Business Card for Your Medical Practice
C. Noel Henley, MD,  May 11, 2012
Does your business card say anything substantive about the valuable work you do in your practice? Here’s how to re-design your next business card for maximum impact and engagement.
Registered Nurses an Ideal Fit for Primary Care Practices
Audrey "Christie" McLaughlin, RN,  May 10, 2012
Here are four good reasons to hire a registered nurse for your primary care practice …maybe even instead of a medical assistant.
The Five Biggest Medical Practice Marketing Mistakes
James Doulgeris,  May 10, 2012
There are best practices to marketing your practice, but often, success is more about knowing what not to do. Here are the five most common pitfalls …and how to avoid them.
Can You Practice Medicine and Manage Your Practice?
Rosemarie Nelson,  May 9, 2012
Whether you practice alone, or in a group, if you're trying to see patients in this pay-for-volume environment and also run the business of your practice, you may be missing out on important opportunities.
  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • Choanal Atresia

    MAR 19 2012 READ >>

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Study Supports CT Screening for Lung Cancer

    MAY 21 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • Amyloid Imaging: The Next Frontier in Alzheimer’s Care

    MAY 9 2012 READ >>

  • Report: Most Imaging Insurance Denials Due to Prior Authorization

    APR 25 2012 READ >>

  • Researchers Tout Faster MRI Protocol

    MAY 9 2012 READ >>

  • Photoacoustics Shows Promise for Identifying Breast Cancer

    MAY 14 2012 READ >>

  • Renegotiating Contracts: What Radiology Groups Should Consider

    APR 30 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • Choanal Atresia

    MAR 19 2012 READ >>

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Gallbladder Ileus

    MAY 7 2012 READ >>

  • Popular
  • Recent

Comments

  • Severe Aortoiliac Disease with Total Occlusion

    APR 26 2012 READ >>

  • Technologist Education Requirements Can Help Cut Repeat Scans

    APR 24 2012 READ >>

  • Cephalohematoma

    FEB 15 2012 READ >>

  • Voice Recognition: Taming the Beast

    APR 27 2012 READ >>

  • Poll of the Week: Provide Breast Density Info to Patients?

    APR 26 2012 READ >>

Comments

  • Radiology Comic: Easter Peep Ultrasound

    APR 4 2012 READ >>

  • Portable Ultrasound Market Grows as Machines Become Smaller, Better

    APR 14 2011 READ >>

  • Canon's Digital Radiography Detectors Receive FDA Clearance

    NOV 22 2011 READ >>

  • Poll of the Week: Reading PET Studies for Alzheimer's?

    MAY 10 2012 READ >>

  • Cephalohematoma

    FEB 15 2012 READ >>

JobListings

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs


SearchMedicaSearchResult

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Imrt
Evidence on Imrt
Guidelines on Imrt
Patient Education on Imrt
Clinical Trials on Imrt
Practical Articles on Imrt
Research and Reviews on Imrt
All "Imrt" results

FeaturedWhitePaper


More white papers >>



CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy