DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • Voice Recognition
  • Low Dose
  • RSNA 2011
  • PET-MR

Home » Daily News

 

PACS storage presents a tale of two archives

By Merlina Trevino | October 5, 2004

Storage is a hot topic in PACS. The best way to cover all your clinical and legal bases is to have two archives, according to Dr. Keith Dreyer, speaking at the Radiology into the 21st Century congress in Boston.

PACS is optimized by using both a clinical priors and a disaster recovery archive, said Dreyer, vice chair of radiology information services at Massachusetts General Hospital and an assistant professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School.

For a clinical priors archive, the best method for storage is a redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID), Dreyer said. It's important for facilities to remain vendor-independent. Getting locked into one vendor's storage option could result in much higher costs.

"We're all trying to do this on a limited or fixed budge. Cost is always important," he said.

The RAID allows for speedy access to data and variable depth of data, two attributes important for a clinical priors archive. Radiologists pulling prior images find having to wait two, four, or even five seconds for the images to load unacceptable, Dreyer said.

The price of a RAID can range from $4000 to $40,000. The difference in price can be attributed to the level of management software and speed associated with the storage media, he said.

Several types of storage arrangements are available for clinical archive purposes. These include network attached storage (NAS), storage area network (SAN), and direct attached storage (DAS). All methods are adequate for a clinical priors archive, according to Dreyer.

The storage needs for disaster recovery archives are very different than for clinical priors. Speed is not nearly as important, and the depth of data stored is fixed and regulated. Whereas lossy compression is widely accepted for a clinical priors archive, lossless compression is the current standard for a disaster recovery archive, Dreyer said.

The most important need for a disaster recovery archive is removable media.

"If it's not removed, it's not secure," he said.

The many types of removable media include digital video disk (DVD), recordable compact disc (CDR), magneto-optical disk (MOD), super digital linear tape (sDLT), and linear tape open 2 (LTO2).

Removable media price varies with performance, which boils down to density and speed. Prices for removable media can range from $250 to $2500.

Despite the different speed and data depth needs, cost, reliability, and upgrading are always important for both archives, Dreyer said.

For more information from the online Diagnostic Imaging archives:

Magneto-optic accessibility gets past obstacles

Grid storage adds intelligence to data archiving task

Radiologists and other fans look at storage

Data archive firm dishes out blue light special for imaging

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






TopicIndex

 

ACOs
Cardiac
Case Studies
Colonography
CT
Digital X-ray
Direct Radiography
Elastography
Low-Dose Modalities
Meaningful Use
Molecular Imaging
MRI
 

 

Nuclear
PACS
PET/CT
PET/MR
Practice Management
RIS
Teleradiology
Ultrasound Imaging
Vendors
Voice Recognition
Women's Imaging
All Topics
 


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 


  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Stomach

    JAN 9 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Telemammography Taking Hold

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Riverain’s Chest X-Ray Comparison Tool Gets FDA Nod

    JAN 11 2012 READ >>

  • Podcast: Implementing a Hybrid PET/MR System

    JAN 30 2012 READ >>

  • Taking Medical Image Sharing to the Cloud

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Doctors Cheating

    JAN 31 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Look at Radiology Exam "Cheating" Misses the Mark

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Columbus Radiology Launches Imaging Ordering App

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Bad Apple

    JAN 17 2012 READ >>



CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy