DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • Voice Recognition
  • Low Dose
  • RSNA 2011
  • PET-MR

Home » Practice Management

Diagnostic Imaging.
 

Biopsy guidance continues to baffle coders

By Kim Snyder, CPC, CPS | September 2, 2010

This issue of biopsy guidance will not go away and the confusion is still with us.

Version 15.3 of the CMS National Correct Coding Policy, Chapter 9, states in the Medically Unlikely Edits section:

CPT codes 76942, 77002, 77003, 77012, and 77021 describe radiologic guidance for needle placement by different modalities. CMS payment policy allows one unit of service for any of these codes at a single patient encounter regardless of the number of needle placements performed. The unit of service for these codes is the patient encounter, not the number of lesions, number of aspirations, number of biopsies, number of injections, or number of localizations.

In the above statement, CMS allows one payment per encounter for needle placement guidance.

Medicare. To be in accordance with Medicare policy, code only one needle placement, according to the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) guidelines. Also, remember this applies only to codes 76942, 77002, 77003, 77012, and 77021. Other guidance codes, such as mammographic (77032), stereotactic (77031), and catheter placement (75989) can be coded and modified with the -59 modifier as necessary for all payers.

Non-Medicare . For commercial insurance, consider applying modifier -59 or -76 if documentation supports the biopsy guidance procedures when reporting 76942, 77002, 77003, 77012, and 77021 for multiple lesions on the same encounter.

When multiple procedures are performed for different patient encounters on the same day, apply the appropriate modifier (-59) to distinguish payment for different encounters, including those involving Medicare patients.

Coding scenarios. Ultrasound-guided needle breast biopsy and stereotactic-guided needle breast biopsy: Your code for this ultrasound scenario will be 76942. Use 77031 with the -59 modifier on the stereotactic biopsy for all payers.

Two stereotactic needle breast biopsies: This concept would be 77031 and 77031 with the appropriate modifier -59, -76, -LT, or -RT (depending on carrier specifics) on the second guidance procedure code 77031.

Society instructions create confusion

CMS instructions state that billing for imaging guidance must be per encounter and not per lesion. However, society guidelines have always defined imaging guidance as per lesion or anatomical area involved, which has created confusion.

American Medical Association: Code 76942 should be per distinct lesion that requires separate needle placement (CPT Assistant, April 2005, page 16).

American College of Radiology: In describing ultrasound guidance for needle aspiration of two breast lesions (76942), ultrasonic guidance for needle placement is also reported twice because two lesions, one at the 2 o’clock position and the other at the 11 o’clock position, were treated. Note, it is the number of lesions sampled, and not the number of punctures, that is the determining factor on how many codes to report (Clinical Examples in Radiology, Fall 2008, page 3).

The Society of Interventional Radiology: The 2009 Coding Guidebook does not provide an opinion for how to code. “CMS has enacted MUEs (Medically Unlikely Edits), which limit the reporting of needle placement imaging guidance codes to once per session. The ACR and SIR are currently reviewing this issue as the code descriptors for the imaging guidance codes clearly state ‘biopsy’ not ‘biopsies.’ We will be exploring these edits with CMS to determine if they are appropriate or if the allowed MUE frequency unit should be increased,” it states.

This creates a bit of confusion, for now, as we must adhere to the CMS guideline and bill all of the listed imaging guidance codes only once per encounter for Medicare patients. If the specialty societies are successful in convincing CMS to increase the MUE unit frequency, then the coding can be revised.

As a reminder, charges that are denied for units in excess of the MUEs may not be billed to the beneficiary. The Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage (ABN) form cannot be used to seek payment from the beneficiary.
 

References:

American Medical Society
American College of Radiology
The Society of Interventional Radiology
Version 15.3 of the CMS National Correct Coding Policy, Chapter 9


Ms. Snyder is a certified professional coder and corporate director of coding for Zotec Partners.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






TopicIndex

 

ACOs
Cardiac
Case Studies
Colonography
CT
Digital X-ray
Direct Radiography
Elastography
Low-Dose Modalities
Meaningful Use
Molecular Imaging
MRI
 

 

Nuclear
PACS
PET/CT
PET/MR
Practice Management
RIS
Teleradiology
Ultrasound Imaging
Vendors
Voice Recognition
Women's Imaging
All Topics
 


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 


FromPhysiciansPractice

'What They Should Really Teach in Medical School'
Julie Schopps, MD , February 6, 2012
The North Carolina-based pediatrician weighs in on why she thinks the real learning doesn't take place until students are out of the classroom.
Improve EHR Systems by Rethinking Medical Billing
Daniel Essin, MA, MD, February 6, 2012
Separating billing-related data from other clinical documentation and transmitting it to a billing system is not difficult …no matter how the charting is done.
Keeping Your Medical Practice’s Accounts Receivable on Track
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, February 4, 2012
Here are the minimum reports you should be running to keep an eye on your practices A/R.
Healthcare Providers Play Crucial Role in Helping Victims of Abuse
Stephen Hanson, PA-C , February 3, 2012
I would urge each and every one of you to be familiar with the warning signs of abuse, and the resources available to you all as healthcare providers.
Protecting Your Medical Practice's Data
Marisa Torrieri, February 3, 2012
Here's the scoop on how to implement a good data-backup plan at your office.
  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Stomach

    JAN 9 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Telemammography Taking Hold

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Riverain’s Chest X-Ray Comparison Tool Gets FDA Nod

    JAN 11 2012 READ >>

  • Podcast: Implementing a Hybrid PET/MR System

    JAN 30 2012 READ >>

  • Taking Medical Image Sharing to the Cloud

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • How to Brand Your Radiology Practice

    JAN 30 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology benefit management credited for slowing imaging growth

    NOV 12 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Private practice groups form first radiology consortium

    FEB 24 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Virtual Radiologic positions itself as a national radiology practice

    AUG 27 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Q&A: Revamping a Radiology Practice’s Revenue Cycle Management

    APR 12 2011 READ >>

  • Popular
  • Recent

Comments

  • Poll of the Week: Is the Use of Recalls Cheating?

    JAN 26 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Columbus Radiology Launches Imaging Ordering App

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Doctors Cheating

    JAN 31 2012 READ >>

  • New MRI Algorithm Cuts Scan Time by Two-Thirds

    DEC 12 2011 READ >>

Comments

  • Plasma Cell Myeloma

    FEB 1 2012 READ >>

  • PET/MR Machines – A Comparison

    JUN 13 2011 DIAGNOSTICIMAGING.COM READ >>

  • Reporting Law Prompting Greater Attention to Radiation Dose

    FEB 6 2012 READ >>

  • Poll of the Week: Do You Deliver Imaging Results Directly to Patients?

    FEB 2 2012 READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

JobListings

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs


SearchMedicaSearchResult

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results


CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy