DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • Voice Recognition
  • Low Dose
  • RSNA 2011
  • PET-MR

Home » Blog

 

My Imaginary Innovation: A Pain Scanner

By Eric Postal, MD | January 20, 2012

I’m not an academician. I’m not even close to being one. The last time I tried conducting lab research, all I managed to prove was that my space in the lab would have been more productively occupied by just about anyone or anything else — an ill-tempered baboon, perhaps, or a hoarder’s collection of old junk mail.

This isn’t to say I’m without ideas. If I had a team of competent researchers at my command, I’d have no shortage of things for them to explore. I most definitely have the 1 percent of success derived from inspiration. It’s the 99 percent perspiration that eludes me. This has the happy effect of insulating me from finding out that my ideas, when fleshed out, might not actually be all that good.

Take, for instance, my would-be contribution to the world of medical imaging: The Substance-P Scan (SPS, for short). I’ll refrain from going into detail about what Substance P is, partially because it’d bore the heck out of you and partially because I was last up-to-date on the subject almost 20 years ago. For all I know, everything I learned about it has since been disproven.

The important concept is that there are chemicals (neurotransmitters and otherwise) central to the physiological process of pain, and I envisioned an imaging modality that could depict where in the body these chemicals were active. Make it a PET-tracer, make it a gadolinium-based contrast agent for MRI — whatever tickles your fancy. Three-D images then to offer up a full-body map of painful processes, with the more painful spots being brighter.

Forget about when SPS would be clinically warranted — it’d probably be quicker and easier to identify cases when it wasn’t. Patient from a multicar collision with distracting injuries: SPS will tell you all the places where they’re hurting. A mentally impaired patient is brought in and cannot provide a history, but they’re moaning and groaning, clearly having some kind of acute episode: SPS shows the smoking gun. A chronic drug-seeker tells the ER he’s having another sickle-cell crisis: Unless SPS shows something, no narcotics today!

The clinicians would love it. Every STS would give them a checklist to run down with each patient before they left the ER, lest the “rule out pneumonia” patient leave without her lumbar pain being addressed, said pain then turning out to be a new compression fracture that the clinician “missed” by not doing an exhaustive Review of Systems.

Because the more painful spots would be more intense, they’d be able to objectively grade the pain their patients were experiencing. No more of this “Patient says pain is 100 on a 10-point scale” silliness. If nothing else, the clinicians would finally be able to validly write some of their favorite histories on our requisition forms: “Pain,” and the ever-popular “R/O pain.”

I have to admit that some of my perseveration with this idea comes from a certain morbid curiosity as to how the healthcare system would handle such a game-changer. Suppose the economics of this new technology were such that every scan had overhead of $1,000; it would not be viable unless reimbursement per study was at least that high.

What would happen? Surely, the Powers That Be would be loath to overtly ration this miraculous new technique by telling the public that, no, we can’t do everything for everyone, and if you want this you’ll have to pay for it yourself. Perhaps there would be intentional bureaucratic foot-dragging to delay its approval for use, in the hope that costs would come down in the meantime. There’s a horde of evidence-based medicine types out there who could gum up the journals for years with conflicting assessments. Then again, other reimbursements could just be cut enough to free up funding to cover this new service. Remember how X-ray got unprofitable when more advanced modalities came along?

Come to think of it, maybe it’s a good thing I’m not cut out for research. If I actually managed to pull off something of this magnitude, it might just kill me to watch my brainchild sitting unused. For all you lab-rats out there, though, feel free to take this ball and run with it. You’re on your honor to throw me a bone when you make your millions.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Aaron Filler | January 23, 2012 12:41 PM EST

Dr. Postal,

Like many of your colleagues, you are obviously unaware of MR Neurography. Although this is not a substance P scan, these images do demonstrate hyperintensity at areas of nerve irritation. There are numerous clinical studies showing a significant correlation with pain when this image finding occurs.
There are over a hundred a peer reviewed publications in this field.

Aaron Filler, MD, PhD, FRCS






VoicesinRadiology

Welcome to Diagnostic Imaging's blog! This is a space for  commentary on medical imaging trends and issues. Opinions expressed by bloggers are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Diagnostic Imaging or its parent company, UBM Medica.  

 

Interested in blogging? E-mail us for details.

TopicIndex

 

ACOs
Cardiac
Case Studies
Colonography
CT
Digital X-ray
Direct Radiography
Elastography
Low-Dose Modalities
Meaningful Use
Molecular Imaging
MRI
 

 

Nuclear
PACS
PET/CT
PET/MR
Practice Management
RIS
Teleradiology
Ultrasound Imaging
Vendors
Voice Recognition
Women's Imaging
All Topics
 


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 


FromPhysiciansPractice

Physicians Need to Balance Roles at Work Just Like at Home
Jennifer Frank, MD, February 21, 2012
Just like laundry duty and getting the kids dressed for their holiday concert, I take my primary-care responsibility very personally and very seriously.
Motivating and Engaging Your Medical Practice Staff
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, February 18, 2012
Providing autonomy and support will motivate your staff in helping you reach your medical practice goals.
Video: EHR User Satisfaction
Aubrey Westgate, February 17, 2012
Family physician Kenneth Adler, a presenter at the HIMSS12 Conference in Las Vegas, provides a look at national EHR user satisfaction rates.
Understanding Physician Assistant Reimbursement
Stephen Hanson, PA-C, February 17, 2012
Appropriate and fair reimbursement for the work physician assistants do in medicine is a priority.
Five Tips to Better Manage Your Revenue Cycle
Owen Dahl, February 14, 2012
It is vital that practices have systematic ways to address patient collections; the following strategies can help your practice collect all that it is due.
  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Plasma Cell Myeloma

    FEB 1 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Doctors Cheating

    JAN 31 2012 READ >>

MostPopular

  • Radiologists Prep for California Dose Reporting Regulation

    FEB 6 2012 READ >>

  • Telemammography Taking Hold

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Why, and How, Radiologists Should Deliver Results to Patients

    FEB 13 2012 READ >>

  • Podcast: Implementing a Hybrid PET/MR System

    JAN 30 2012 READ >>

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

MostPopular

  • Radiology Comic: Doctors Cheating

    JAN 31 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Look at Radiology Exam "Cheating" Misses the Mark

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Radiology Weasel, Waffle and Hedge

    FEB 14 2012 READ >>

  • New iPad App Allows for Sharing Radiology Teaching Files

    FEB 14 2012 READ >>



CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy