DiagnosticImaging Members: Login | Register
Diagnostic Imaging Recommended Medical Sites Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Conference Reports
  • Case Studies
  • Jobs
  • Product Directory
  • Voice Recognition
  • Low Dose
  • RSNA 2011
  • PET-MR

Home » Radiation Safety

Diagnostic Imaging.
 

Radiologists call for national strategy to address medical imaging overuse

By The Radiological Society of North America | August 24, 2010

Overutilization of medical imaging services exposes patients to unnecessary radiation and adds to healthcare costs, according to a report.

The article, published in Radiology, calls on radiologists to spearhead a collaborative effort to curb imaging overutilization.

"In most cases, an imaging procedure enhances the accuracy of a diagnosis or guides a medical treatment and is fully justified because it benefits the patient," said lead author William R. Hendee, Ph.D., a distinguished professor of radiology, radiation oncology, biophysics, and bioethics at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. "But some imaging procedures are not justified, because they are unnecessary for the patient’s care. These are the uses of imaging that we, as medical physicists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and educators, are trying to identify and eliminate."

The growth in medical imaging over the past two decades has yielded important and life-saving benefits to patients. Medical imaging has allowed millions of patients to avoid more invasive diagnostic and treatment procedures. However, overutilization of medical imaging services can be detrimental to patients by exposing them to unnecessary radiation. Between 1980 and 2006, the annual U.S. population radiation dose from medical procedures increased sevenfold, according to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.

In August 2009, the American Board of Radiology Foundation hosted a two-day summit with more than 60 participating organizations to examine the causes and effects of imaging overutilization.

The summit identified several key forces influencing overutilization, including payment mechanisms and financial incentives in the U.S. healthcare system, the practice behavior of referring physicians, self-referral, defensive medicine, patient expectations, and duplicate imaging exams.

"There are many causes of overutilization of imaging in medicine," Hendee said. "Some of these causes, such as self-referral to physician-owned imaging facilities and defensive medicine to shield against potential lawsuits, are beyond radiology's influence to correct and must be dealt with more globally within medicine. However, some of the causes do occur within radiology, and the profession is hard at work to address them."

Summit participants offered several suggestions to reduce overutilization, such as a national collaborative effort to develop evidence-based appropriateness criteria for imaging, greater use of practice guidelines in requesting and conducting imaging exams, decision support at the point of care, education of referring physicians and the public, accreditation of imaging facilities, management of self-referral and defensive medicine, and payment reform.

The Radiology report outlines several of these suggestions and states that these efforts will require the cooperation and active collaboration of many groups, including radiologists, physicists, oncologists, referring physicians, payers of healthcare services, patient and public interest groups, and vendors of medical imaging equipment.

A second summit, called "Improving Patient Care through Effective Communicating in Imaging," was held in Washington, DC, Aug. 5-6.

In June 2009, the RSNA and the American College of Radiology established the Joint Task Force on Adult Radiation Protection to address concerns about patient radiation exposure from medical imaging procedures. The task force subsequently broadened the participating primary member institutions to include the American Association of Physicists in Medicine and the American Society of Radiologic Technologists and is in the process of developing the "Image Wisely" campaign for adult radiation protection.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Stephen LITTLEFAIR | September 08, 2010 6:38 PM EDT

Why has it taken so long to state the obvious ?

There has always been wholsesale abuse of radiology departments.

Referrals made from ER because it's easier and quicker to request a radiograph than examine the patient.

Protocol driven radiology departments who always want the same number of projections regardless of history.

Defensive medicine.

Examinations sought by junior medicos "for the ward round in the morning"or my boss will be pissed.

Examinations requested "out of habit" despite evidence showing that the radiograph..positive or negative will not affect patient outcome.

 

by jayaraj govindaraj | September 01, 2010 1:12 PM EDT

A typical case will be a Master Health patient who is "investigated" for current Health Status and estimating potential risks !!


by joseph kimaiyo | September 01, 2010 6:22 AM EDT

Clincians have relied so much in radiation daignosis other than the clinical aspect hence its over.

by Peter Halt | September 01, 2010 3:06 AM EDT

It is up to the radiologists to stand up to the ordering physicians and stop the madness of over scanning patients.  You can say no.  Typically an ER doc orders a CT and makes more money by increasing the complexity of the workup, reduces their liability, satisfies a patient,  while getting a diagnosis in 10% of the time, and all they have to do was let a triage nurse check a box.  There is currently no downside to overscanning, since the epidemic of leukemia and lymphoma cases from iatragenic radiation hasn't hit yet.  Lawyers are gearing up.  Patients or families frequently insist on advanced imaging and need to be educated.  A simple consent form for the patient receiving any ionizing radiation would solve a lot of problems.

by Johan Aps | September 01, 2010 2:07 AM EDT

I teach Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology at the Ghent University in Belgium and as such get many referrals from private practices as well as from inside the university hospital. The number of radiographs has increased as colleagues have "heard"that digital radiography causes less radiation dose to the patient. So they can take more. At the end of the line the dose to the patient is even higher than before. I also get angry when I hear about or see  referred patients with a paper-print-out version of the digital radiograph. Many colleagues do, with as a result another exposure for the patient. Again resulting in a higher exposure to ionizing radiation. What I wanted to state is that "all medical professionals need continuous education" in order to serve the public as good as possible.

Article Comment Pages: 1 2 3 Next







TopicIndex

 

ACOs
Cardiac
Case Studies
Colonography
CT
Digital X-ray
Direct Radiography
Elastography
Low-Dose Modalities
Meaningful Use
Molecular Imaging
MRI
 

 

Nuclear
PACS
PET/CT
PET/MR
Practice Management
RIS
Teleradiology
Ultrasound Imaging
Vendors
Voice Recognition
Women's Imaging
All Topics
 


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 


FromPhysiciansPractice

Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
  • On This Site
  • Most Emailed
  • On This Topic

MostPopular

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism

    DEC 13 2011 READ >>

MostPopular

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Telemammography Taking Hold

    JAN 24 2012 READ >>

  • Riverain’s Chest X-Ray Comparison Tool Gets FDA Nod

    JAN 11 2012 READ >>

  • Taking Medical Image Sharing to the Cloud

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

MostPopular

  • Whole-breast ultrasound brings significant screening benefits

    JAN 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASIA PACIFIC READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • As teleradiology evolves, it changes dramatically, plays growing role in practice

    DEC 15 2010 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING READ >>

  • Delayed side effects persist in IV iodinated contrast media

    MAY 28 2009 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EUROPE READ >>

  • Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Stomach

    JAN 9 2012 READ >>

  • Popular
  • Recent

Comments

  • Poll of the Week: Is the Use of Recalls Cheating?

    JAN 26 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism

    DEC 13 2011 READ >>

  • Columbus Radiology Launches Imaging Ordering App

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

  • New MRI Algorithm Cuts Scan Time by Two-Thirds

    DEC 12 2011 READ >>

Comments

  • Poll of the Week: Is the Use of Recalls Cheating?

    JAN 26 2012 READ >>

  • Radiology Comic: Doctors Cheating

    JAN 31 2012 READ >>

  • CNN Investigation Targets Radiology Board Exam Cheating

    JAN 13 2012 READ >>

  • Cloud Image Sharing: One Clinic’s Experience

    JAN 19 2012 READ >>

  • My Imaginary Innovation: A Pain Scanner

    JAN 20 2012 READ >>

JobListings

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs


 


CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy