Diagnostic Imaging Members: Login | Register

Diagnostic Imaging
    About Us

TOPIC CENTERS


MORE INFO



Home » Viewpoints » Imaging Safety

 


Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

MRI Safety and Orthopedic Implants

By Frank Shellock, Ph.D. | May 8, 2007

Most orthopedic implants are made from nonferromagnetic materials and, therefore, tend to be acceptable for patients undergoing MRI examinations. In vitro testing conducted at 1.5T and 3T has verified the safe aspects of orthopedic devices with regard to magnetic field interactions (see www.MRIsafety.com for a summary of this information).

To date, only the Perfix interference screw used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has been found to be highly ferromagnetic. Because this interference screw is firmly embedded in bone for its specific application, however, it is held in place with sufficient retentive force to prevent movement or dislodgment. Patients with Perfix interference screws have safely undergone MR procedures using systems operating at 1.5T.

The presence of the Perfix interference screw causes extensive image distortion during MR imaging of the knee. Therefore, interference screws made from materials with low magnetic susceptibility should be used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament if MRI is to be used for subsequent evaluation of the knee.

Since the metals used for orthopedic implants are good conductors, MRI-related heating is a concern. In some cases, due to the length or formation of a conductive loop, MRI-related heating may be substantial, posing a potential hazard for a patient undergoing an MRI procedure. This is especially problematic for external fixation systems.

EXTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEMS

External fixation systems comprise specially designed frames, clamps, rods, rod-to-rod couplings, pins, posts, fasteners, wire fixations, fixation bolts, washers, nuts, hinges, sockets, connecting bars, screws, and other components used in orthopedic and reconstructive surgery. Indications for external fixation systems are varied and include the following treatment applications:

  • open and closed fracture fixation
  • pseudoarthroses of long bones (both congenital and acquired)
  • limb lengthening by metaphyseal or epiphyseal distraction
  • correction of bony or soft-tissue defects
  • correction of bony or soft-tissue deformities

The assessment of safety issues for external fixation systems is particularly challenging because of the myriad of possible components, many made from conductive materials, and various configurations used for these devices. The primary concern is MRI-related heating, which is dependent on particular aspects of the external fixation systems. The MRI conditions used (field strength, radiofrequency field, RF transmit coil, pulse sequence, body part imaged, and so on) greatly affect the safety aspects of scanning patients with external fixation systems.

In order to ensure patient safety, guidelines must be implemented on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, MRI users are referred to product labeling approved by the FDA for a given external fixation system. Safe MRI conditions typically apply to the specific configuration(s) used in the evaluation of a given fixation device only. Other configurations may be unsafe.

VIBRATION OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





Article Tools
Sponsored White Papers


SponsoredResources


OptumInsight
Acadiana Computer Systems, Inc. gains a 100% ROI on their radiology billing


Key Equipment Finance
Michiana Hematology Oncology Success Story


Barco
Multi-modality breast imaging using RapidFrame™ technology


Siemens
3D Ultrasound of the Breast


Ziosoft, Inc.
PhyZiodynamic Solutions: Applying Supercomputing to Patient Care


Siemens
Easy Guide to Low Dose


Medrad
Improving Clinical Outcomes and Workflow
Toshiba America Medical Systems
Minimizing dose, sedation in pediatric CT

 

View All

 
What's New on DiagnosticImaging.com

PET with FDG May Predict Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
February 8, 2012
PET Technique Useful in Challenging Breast Cancer Cases
February 7, 2012
Practices Adjust Workflow, IT for Tomosynthesis Adoption
February 7, 2012
Large Hospital System Successfully Adopts CPOE for Radiology
February 7, 2012
Featured White Paper


More white papers >>



CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy