Cardiology fellows may find their cardiovascular MR training inadequate compared with nuclear and vascular imaging, according to a study by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. The lack of CMR equipment and/or curricula concerns the ACCF because recently revised training guidelines require a minimum exposure to the modality.
Cardiology fellows may find their cardiovascular MR training inadequate compared with nuclear and vascular imaging, according to a study by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. The lack of CMR equipment and/or curricula concerns the ACCF because recently revised training guidelines require a minimum exposure to the modality.
A survey developed by the cardiovascular imaging committee of the ACCF was sent to program directors of all 183 accredited cardiovascular training programs. The 21-question, multiple-response survey collected parallel data for both CMR and vascular imaging. Queries about nuclear cardiology capabilities provided a reference for comparison (JACC 2004; 43[11]: 2108-12).
Conducted between November 2002 and January 2003, the survey garnered a 52% response rate. It revealed that only 12 respondents out of 96 owned CMR hardware, compared with 46 for nuclear and 42 for vascular.
"Ownership of CMR hardware is a major infrastructural hurdle for training programs," said lead author Dr. Allen J. Taylor, program director of cardiovascular medicine at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC, and colleagues.
They encouraged programs to take full advantage of local and regional centers to broaden the training opportunities. Collaborative relationships between clinical departments, such as radiology and cardiology, will be crucial to the success of these efforts, according to the authors.
Nearly 100% of respondents indicated they have dedicated fellow rotations in nuclear imaging, compared with 64% in vascular and 29% in CMR. Nearly half of the CMR programs have no formal curriculum, defined as written, content-based, and periodically recurring. The breadth of training opportunities in centers with CMR is typically very limited.
Overall, the program directors rated the importance of incorporating new technologies within their programs as high, but nuclear and vascular were rated significantly higher (5.7 and 5.2, respectively) than CMR (4.9) on a scale of 1 "not important at all" to 7 "extremely important."
Faculty having expertise and dedicated training time for CMR came from cardiology at only 18% of programs and from radiology at a mere 6%. At 19% of programs, both disciplines supplied dedicated CMR faculty.
In April 2002, the core cardiovascular training symposium (COCATS-2) was revised to include, among other changes, a one-month minimum exposure by cardiovascular fellows to CMR. The guidelines recommend that fellows actively participate in CMR study interpretation and didactic courses.
"Maturation of CMR methodologies and greater penetrance and acceptance of the techniques into clinical practice are essential stepping-stones to success," the study said.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Cardiac MR imaging anticipates bright future
Radiologists fall prey to encroachment
MR and echocardiography race for cardiac supremacy
CT Study: AI Algorithm Comparable to Radiologists in Differentiating Small Renal Masses
May 14th 2024An emerging deep learning algorithm had a lower AUC and sensitivity than urological radiologists for differentiating between small renal masses on computed tomography (CT) scans but had a 21 percent higher sensitivity rate than non-urological radiologists, according to new research.
What a New Meta-Analysis Reveals About Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment with Computed Tomography
May 13th 2024While acknowledging variable accuracy overall with CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) values, researchers found that the accuracy rate increased to 90 percent for FFR-CT values greater > 0.90 and < 0.49.
ACR Collaborative Model Achieves 20 Percent Improvement in PI-QUAL Scores for Prostate MRI
May 9th 2024Using a learning network model to discuss challenges and share insights among radiology departments from five different organizations, researchers noted that 87 percent of audited prostate MRI exams had PI-QUAL scores > 4 at the conclusion of the collaborative program.
MRI-Based Deep Learning Algorithm Shows Comparable Detection of csPCa to Radiologists
May 8th 2024In a study involving over 1,000 visible prostate lesions on biparametric MRI, a deep learning algorithm detected 96 percent of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in comparison to a 98 percent detection rate for an expert genitourinary radiologist.