Contrast-enhanced lymphosonography finds more sentinel lymph nodes than can established nuclear medicine techniques, according to preliminary animal studies focusing on melanoma.
Contrast-enhanced lymphosonography finds more sentinel lymph nodes than can established nuclear medicine techniques, according to preliminary animal studies focusing on melanoma.
Dr. Barry Goldberg, director of diagnostic ultrasound at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, and colleagues studied how the location of melanoma tumors in swine affected the number of sentinel lymph nodes associated with each tumor. They used contrast-enhanced sonography, established nuclear medicine methods, and blue dye-guided surgery to find and evaluate lymph nodes.
When results of the two minimally invasive techniques were compared with the surgical method, the researchers found that lymphosonography performed significantly better than nuclear medicine. They reported their findings at the 2006 RSNA meeting.
Twenty-four swine had 39 melanoma tumors, 10 of them in the head and neck. Blue dye-guided surgery, the gold standard for sentinel lymph node location, found a total of 47 sentinel lymph nodes for those 10 head and neck tumors. Surgery located a total of 94 sentinel lymph nodes for the 29 tumors located in other parts of the body. More sentinel lymph nodes per tumor for melanoma were located in the head and neck, an average of 4.7 nodes per tumor versus 3.24 per tumor elsewhere in the body.
Both of the minimally invasive methods were more accurate when detecting sentinel nodes in the body than in the head and neck, but contrast-enhanced lymphosonography outperformed nuclear medicine in both groups. Lymphosonography using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo) detected 77% of the sentinel lymph nodes for tumors in the head and neck, while nuclear medicine using technetium-99m found only 58%. For melanoma tumors located in other parts of the body, lymphosonography detected 94% of the sentinel lymph nodes, while nuclear imaging found 73%.
No human trials have been conducted, but improvements in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes could improve staging. Goldberg has conducted previous studies using other animal models to investigate how accurately lymphosonography can detect specific levels of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes.
Dr. Emma Starritt and colleagues published a study in 2005 in the Annals of Surgical Oncology examining the threshold at which high-resolution ultrasound could detect metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of human melanoma patients. They located the sentinel lymph nodes using nuclear imaging, then used high-resolution ultrasound without contrast to try to detect metastases. They could detect only metastases 4.1 mm in diameter or larger.
Leading Breast Radiologists Discuss the USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations
May 17th 2024In recognition of National Women’s Health Week, Dana Bonaminio, MD, Amy Patel, MD, and Stacy Smith-Foley, MD, shared their thoughts and perspectives on the recently updated breast cancer screening recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Multicenter CT Study Shows Benefits of Emerging Diagnostic Model for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
May 15th 2024Combining clinical and CT features, adjunctive use of a classification and regression tree (CART) diagnostic model demonstrated AUCs for detecting clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) that were 15 to 22 percent higher than unassisted radiologist assessments.
CT Study: AI Algorithm Comparable to Radiologists in Differentiating Small Renal Masses
May 14th 2024An emerging deep learning algorithm had a lower AUC and sensitivity than urological radiologists for differentiating between small renal masses on computed tomography (CT) scans but had a 21 percent higher sensitivity rate than non-urological radiologists, according to new research.