CHICAGO - As the number of CT scans done in the US has climbed, so has the number of incidental findings - and the related malpractice risks for radiologists. Leonard Berlin, MD, in an interview on malpractice risk at RSNA 2011, says the right path isn't clear.
As the number of CT scans done in the US has climbed, so has the number of incidental findings - and the related malpractice risks for radiologists.
If, while reviewing an image of a lung, you happen to spy a possibly cancer on a kidney, do you ignore it and open yourself to a malpractice trial down the road if it turns out to be something? Do you obey the law of probability or look out for each individual patient?
Most incidentals, fully 99 percent, turn out to be meaningless. Drawing attention to them simply adds cost to the system and forces the patient to undergo possibly unnecessary tests and further radiation.
On the flip side, for any individual patient, ignoring the incidental could mean a disease goes un-diagnosed too long.
As Leonard Berlin, MD, put it in an interview on malpractice risk at RSNA 2011, patients don’t want to hear about statistics. They only care about their own bodies.
The appropriate choice for radiologists, he summarized, simply isn’t clear.
Appealing Prior Authorization Denials: Can it be Effective for Emerging Technologies?
May 14th 2024While radiologists and other providers may be discouraged by insurer denials saying the use of a technological advance is “unproven and investigational,” 82 percent of appeals for prior authorization denials were approved in 2021.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Female Representation in Radiology: Where Things Stand
March 25th 2024Women comprise nearly 80 percent of breast imaging departments and 45 percent of pediatric radiology departments at academic institutions, but burnout, the COVID-19 pandemic and discrimination have impeded further progress in radiology, according to a recently published literature review.