Speech recognition software produces eight times as many errors as conventional dictation transcription in breast imaging reports, according to new research published in the October American Journal of Roentgenology.
Speech recognition software produces eight times as many errors as conventional dictation transcription in breast imaging reports, according to new research published in the October American Journal of Roentgenology.
Lead author Sarah Basma of Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Canada, and colleagues considered 615 breast imaging reports from January 2009 to April 2011. The reports, from two hospitals, were evenly split between those created through automated speech recognition and conventional dictation transcription. They found at least one major error in 23 percent of reports done via speech recognition. With dictation transcription, the rate was 4 percent.
Major errors included word omission, word substitution, nonsense phrases, and punctuation errors, among others.
Errors varied by report type. Breast MRI reports were most prone to them, with 35 percent of speech recognition versions having a major error, 13 percent of interventional procedures, and 15 percent of mammography reports (the dictation equivalents had error rates of 7 percent, 4 percent and 0 percent, respectively).
Seniority and native language had little bearing on error rates, the researchers found.
“We thought that there may be a higher error rate for non-native English speakers because the software works with voice recognition, but that didn’t happen,” said co-author Anabel Scaranelo, MD, of the University Health Network in Toronto.
After adjustment for academic rank, native language, and imaging modality, reports generated with speech recognition were eight times as likely as conventional dictation transcription reports to contain major errors.
Considering Breast- and Lesion-Level Assessments with Mammography AI: What New Research Reveals
June 27th 2025While there was a decline of AUC for mammography AI software from breast-level assessments to lesion-level evaluation, the authors of a new study, involving 1,200 women, found that AI offered over a seven percent higher AUC for lesion-level interpretation in comparison to unassisted expert readers.
SNMMI: Can 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Bolster Detection of PCa Recurrence in the Prostate Bed?
June 24th 2025In an ongoing prospective study of patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa and an initial negative PSMA PET/CT, preliminary findings revealed positive 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT scans in over 54 percent of the cohort, according to a recent poster presentation at the SNMMI conference.