• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Abnormal Imaging Results Lost to Follow-up


Follow-up after abnormal imaging may be delayed due to poor communication.

Tracking systems should be developed to ensure timely follow-up recommendations that result from abnormal imaging, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

Researchers from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas performed a retrospective review to test whether certain aspects of communication in radiology reports influenced the response of the referring providers, and hence follow-up on abnormal findings.

Radiology reports from 250 patients were reviewed. The researchers focused on expressions of doubt in the radiology report and recommendations for further imaging. Follow-up was defined as one or more of the following, within four weeks of the original imaging:

• Patient notification of the test result

• Ordering or referral for recommended follow-up test or imaging study

• Follow-up test or consultation

• Documentation addressing abnormal imaging in the medical record

The results showed further imaging studies were recommended for 162 of all abnormal imaging studies (64.8%) compared with 88  (35.2%) that did not have these recommendations.

“Patients whose reports contained recommendations for further imaging were more likely to have been lost to follow-up at 4 weeks compared with patients without such recommendations,” the authors wrote. However, expressions of doubt in the radiology report did not affect how quickly follow-up was done.

The researchers pointed out that an earlier study had shown verbal communication regarding abnormal results could be more effective in obtaining timely follow-up for patients, however verbal communication is not always possible. They also noted that electronic communication could have a negative effect on follow-up because there may be ambiguity about who is responsible for follow-up and there may be too much information (information overload) with comprehensive EHRs.

“Abnormal imaging results with recommendations for additional imaging may be more vulnerable to lack of timely follow-up,” the researchers concluded. “Additional safeguards, such as tracking systems, should be developed to prevent failure to follow up on such results.”

Related Videos
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.