Follow-up after abnormal imaging may be delayed due to poor communication.
Tracking systems should be developed to ensure timely follow-up recommendations that result from abnormal imaging, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas performed a retrospective review to test whether certain aspects of communication in radiology reports influenced the response of the referring providers, and hence follow-up on abnormal findings.
Radiology reports from 250 patients were reviewed. The researchers focused on expressions of doubt in the radiology report and recommendations for further imaging. Follow-up was defined as one or more of the following, within four weeks of the original imaging:
• Patient notification of the test result
• Ordering or referral for recommended follow-up test or imaging study
• Follow-up test or consultation
• Documentation addressing abnormal imaging in the medical record
The results showed further imaging studies were recommended for 162 of all abnormal imaging studies (64.8%) compared with 88 (35.2%) that did not have these recommendations.
“Patients whose reports contained recommendations for further imaging were more likely to have been lost to follow-up at 4 weeks compared with patients without such recommendations,” the authors wrote. However, expressions of doubt in the radiology report did not affect how quickly follow-up was done.
The researchers pointed out that an earlier study had shown verbal communication regarding abnormal results could be more effective in obtaining timely follow-up for patients, however verbal communication is not always possible. They also noted that electronic communication could have a negative effect on follow-up because there may be ambiguity about who is responsible for follow-up and there may be too much information (information overload) with comprehensive EHRs.
“Abnormal imaging results with recommendations for additional imaging may be more vulnerable to lack of timely follow-up,” the researchers concluded. “Additional safeguards, such as tracking systems, should be developed to prevent failure to follow up on such results.”
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Current Perspectives on Radiology Workforce Issues and Potential Solutions
March 14th 2024Emphasizing the gravity of the ongoing workforce shortage in radiology, these authors recommend a change agenda focusing on expanded numbers of residency positions, reassessment of educational pathways, maintaining a strong presence in hospital settings and practice level initiatives to reduce administrative burden and achieve appropriate reimbursement beyond RVU measurements.
Could Cloud-Based 'Progressive Loading' be a Boon for Radiology Workflows?
March 13th 2024The newly launched Progressive Loading feature, available through RamSoft’s OmegaAI software, reportedly offers radiologist rapid uploading of images that is faster than on-site networks and other cloud-based systems regardless of the network radiologists are using.