ACR Practice Guidelines Not Followed When Evaluating Nipple Discharge
Not following ACR practice guidelines potentially leads to unnecessary workups and extra health care costs.
There is significant variability among radiologists’ choice of imaging modality for evaluation of benign and pathologic nipple discharge, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from Arizona and Georgia undertook an online survey to assess radiologists' choice of imaging modality for the evaluation of clinical symptoms of physiologic nipple discharge (e.g., bilateral discharge, multiple-duct orifices, and yellow, green, or white color) and pathologic nipple discharge (e.g., unilateral discharge, single-duct orifices, spontaneous and serous discharge, and clear or bloodstained color).
A total of 8,170 surveys were sent to lead interpreting physicians at mammography facilities accredited by the American College of Radiology (ACR). The researchers received 849 responses, for a response rate of 10.4%. For the workup of physiologic nipple discharge, recommendations included:
- 30% screening mammography (SM)
- 24%, diagnostic mammography (DM) only
- 46%, both DM and targeted ultrasound (US) (DM plus US)
Practitioners in nonacademic settings and those who read breast images during less than 50% of their practice were significantly more likely to recommend DM (with or without US), compared with SM (the standard recommended by the ACR). Practitioners who read breast images less than 50% of the time were also more likely to recommend MRI after conventional imaging revealed negative results.
Related article: Mammography Focuses on Patient Comfort to Improve Test Rates
For the workup of pathologic nipple discharge, recommendations included:
- 91.0% DM plus US
- 8.5%, DM only
- Fewer than 1.0%, SM
Nonacademic providers and those who read breast images less than 50% of the time were significantly less likely to recommend DM plus US (the standard recommended by the ACR), compared with DM only.
The researchers concluded that there is variability in imaging modality selection among U.S. radiologists handling the imaging workflow for benign and pathologic nipple discharge. Radiologists do not uniformly follow ACR practice guidelines, which potentially leads to unnecessary workups and extra healthcare costs.
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 2
July 23rd 2025In the second part of a multi-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, discuss key sequences for abbreviated breast MRI and how it stacks up to other breast cancer screening modalities.
FDA Clears Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Platform and AI Software for Neuraxial Procedures
July 17th 2025The dual FDA clearances for the Accuro 3S point-of-care ultrasound device and the SpineNav-AI machine learning-based software may enhance precision and safety with ultrasound-guided neuraxial procedures.
FDA Expands Approval of MRI-Guided Ultrasound Treatment for Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
July 9th 2025For patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, the expanded FDA approval of the Exablate Neuro platform allows for the use of MRI-guided focused ultrasound in performing staged bilateral pallidothalamic tractotomy.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
