The American Cancer Society has added CT colonography to its approved list of colon cancer screening methods. Released this week, the new guidelines designate virtual colonoscopy as a “preferred” test that “finds polyps and cancer” and should be performed every five years.
The American Cancer Society has added CT colonography to its approved list of colon cancer screening methods. Released this week, the new guidelines designate virtual colonoscopy as a "preferred" test that "finds polyps and cancer" and should be performed every five years.
Other tests, such as fecal occult blood testing, are described as less likely to pinpoint polyps. This is the first time the ACS has favored one specific type of test over another, according to Dr. Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancer for the ACS.
The new listing is the second boost that CTC has received in the last few months. In late 2007, outcomes from the ACRIN 6664 trial deemed CTC comparable to standard colonoscopy for screening intermediate and large-sized polyps. In the trial, the prevalence of lesions at 6 mm or larger came in at a low 8.3%. As a result, most patients who undergo CTC would not also require therapeutic colonoscopy, according to the ACRIN trial leaders.
Virtual colonoscopy's inclusion in the ACS guidelines should be a major boon in the reimbursement arena for the modality
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
CTC pushes for rightful place in colorectal cancer screening
Philips' filet irons kinks out of virtual colonoscopy
European trial data bolster argument for CT colonography
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.