Radiologists can sharpen their interpretation skills by reviewing autopsies and learning from missed diagnoses.
Radiologists can sharpen their interpretation skills by reviewing autopsies and learning from missed diagnoses, said researchers in a study published this month in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Autopsies are not done as frequently now as they were in the past. The CDC estimates that the autopsy rate is only about 8 percent now, compared with 19 percent in the 1970s, but doctors, including radiologists, can still learn a lot from post-mortem examinations.
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine reviewed 179 cases from 2008 and compared the diagnoses with the autopsy findings. To be included in the study, the subjects had to have undergone a radiological examination within one month prior to death.
There were 333 discrepancies found between the diagnoses from imaging exams and autopsy findings. Of these discrepancies, 201 were thought to have been present at the time of examination and that 119 resulted from various limitations of the imaging.
As advanced as the technology is, CT scans, MR images, ultrasounds and nuclear studies cannot provide the natural full-color, 3D, and microscopic level examinations provided by autopsy, the authors wrote. As a result, they found several situations where comorbidities obscured the diagnostic imaging study so other processes could not be seen.
“For example, a pericardial effusion that might soon cause cardiac tamponade can be obscured by adjacent consolidation on an anteroposterior chest radiograph,” explained the authors. They added that motion, fat, or metal artifacts can also hide important information.
Although most of the discrepancies were not significant, there was a 3.3 percent radiologic error rate: 11 missed diagnoses and seven misinterpretations. The missed diagnoses included pneumonia, hepatocellular carcinoma, a gastrointestinal bleed, and bladder carcinoma, among others.
The authors concluded that although fewer autopsies are being done and despite the advanced technology available, radiologists could use autopsy findings to refine their interpretation skills and to use as a quality control, learning from missed diagnoses and misinterpretations, some of which could be as simple as mistaking the right side from the left when examining the images.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.