Radiologists can sharpen their interpretation skills by reviewing autopsies and learning from missed diagnoses.
Radiologists can sharpen their interpretation skills by reviewing autopsies and learning from missed diagnoses, said researchers in a study published this month in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Autopsies are not done as frequently now as they were in the past. The CDC estimates that the autopsy rate is only about 8 percent now, compared with 19 percent in the 1970s, but doctors, including radiologists, can still learn a lot from post-mortem examinations.
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine reviewed 179 cases from 2008 and compared the diagnoses with the autopsy findings. To be included in the study, the subjects had to have undergone a radiological examination within one month prior to death.
There were 333 discrepancies found between the diagnoses from imaging exams and autopsy findings. Of these discrepancies, 201 were thought to have been present at the time of examination and that 119 resulted from various limitations of the imaging.
As advanced as the technology is, CT scans, MR images, ultrasounds and nuclear studies cannot provide the natural full-color, 3D, and microscopic level examinations provided by autopsy, the authors wrote. As a result, they found several situations where comorbidities obscured the diagnostic imaging study so other processes could not be seen.
“For example, a pericardial effusion that might soon cause cardiac tamponade can be obscured by adjacent consolidation on an anteroposterior chest radiograph,” explained the authors. They added that motion, fat, or metal artifacts can also hide important information.
Although most of the discrepancies were not significant, there was a 3.3 percent radiologic error rate: 11 missed diagnoses and seven misinterpretations. The missed diagnoses included pneumonia, hepatocellular carcinoma, a gastrointestinal bleed, and bladder carcinoma, among others.
The authors concluded that although fewer autopsies are being done and despite the advanced technology available, radiologists could use autopsy findings to refine their interpretation skills and to use as a quality control, learning from missed diagnoses and misinterpretations, some of which could be as simple as mistaking the right side from the left when examining the images.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.