What appears to be the first scientific study to evaluate the use of handheld computers for charge capture gave the technology high marks. Results of the study, presented Sunday at the HIMSS meeting, are important because of the increased need for
What appears to be the first scientific study to evaluate the use of handheld computers for charge capture gave the technology high marks. Results of the study, presented Sunday at the HIMSS meeting, are important because of the increased need for accuracy in medical billing to avoid government fines involving Medicare and Medicaid fraud.
New billing solutions are also financially relevant, since hospitals and physicians lose an estimated $60 billion annually due to lost or miscoded charges.
The average physician loses about $60,000 a year for the same reasons, according to the paper's author, Dr. Scott M. Strayer, an assistant professor of clinical family medicine at St. Louis University who is also president and CEO of PocketMed, a maker of handheld software solutions.
Handheld computers offer one obvious opportunity to improve clinical billing practices. Around 20% of physicians already use handheld computers to enhance the delivery of medical care, according to The New York Times. An analysis by W.R. Hambrecht predicted that by next year more than 50% of all physicians will have incorporated the technology in their practices.
Currently, physicians capture inpatient codes using index cards and preprinted charge slips.
Strayer compared the billing accuracy of six physicians at St. Louis University Family Practice Residency during two three-month periods before and after implementation of a handheld charge capture system. The study found that five out of six attending physicians used the handheld computer billing method for a compliance rate of 83%. Charge capture rates were calculated for these five faculty members.
When the index cards were used, 86 patients were recorded compared with 105 patients recorded using the hospital system, representing a charge capture rate of 82%.
After implementation of the billing system, 113 of 122 patients were captured, representing a 93% charge capture rate, a statistically significant increase in patient capture.
"The number of inpatients captured increased, and the technology was easily implemented and acceptable to the majority of study physicians with minimal (one-hour) training," Strayer said.
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.