Screening performance with MR imaging and mammography depends on breast cancer risk category.
Screening performance in breast screening is dependent on risk category, according to a study published in the journal, Radiology.
Researchers from the Netherlands evaluated the real-life performance of a breast cancer screening program for women with different categories of increased breast cancer risk with multiple follow-up rounds, from Jan. 1, 2003, to Jan. 1, 2014.
The researchers evaluated screening MR imaging and mammography for women who had an increased risk of breast cancer. Risk category, age, recall for workup of screening-detected abnormalities, biopsy, and histopathologic diagnosis were recorded. Recall rate, biopsy rate, positive predictive value of recall, positive predictive value of biopsy, cancer detection rate, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for first and follow-up rounds.
The results provided 8,818 MR and 6,245 mammographic examinations performed in 2,463 women. There were 170 documented cancers among the examinations and of these, there were 129 screening-detected cancers, 16 interval cancers, and 25 cancers discovered at prophylactic mastectomy. The researchers noted that the overall sensitivity including cancers discovered at mastectomy was 75.9 percent, while it was 90 percent if those cancers were excluded.
For carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, the sensitivity for was lowest at 66.1 percent when including cancers in prophylactic mastectomy specimens and 81.3 percent when not including these cancers. Specificity was higher at follow-up, at 96.5 percent than it was in first rounds, when it was 85.1 percent. Specificity was high for both MR imaging, at 97.1 percent and mammography, at 98.7 percent. Positive predictive value of recall and positive predictive value of biopsy were lowest in women who had only a family history of breast cancer.
The researchers concluded that screening performance was dependent on risk category, with sensitivity lowest in carriers of the BRCA1 mutation. They noted that the specificity of high-risk breast screening improved at follow-up rounds.
Can Diffusion MRI Predict Patient Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer?
October 23rd 2024A model emphasizing time-dependent diffusion MRI was 15 percent more effective than apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for women with breast cancer, according to new research.
Is the Kaiser Score More Effective than BI-RADS for Assessing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and MRI?
October 14th 2024For women with breast-enhanced masses, Kaiser scoring (KS) demonstrated a 20 percent higher AUC than BI-RADS classification for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and was comparable to KS for breast MRI.