Register Now: Image-Based Risk: The Next Frontier in Breast Cancer Screening
|Articles|December 2, 2010

Breast pain indicates possibility of cancer, study finds

Author(s)Rebekah Moan

Study reveals breast pain can be only indicator of breast cancer. Findings challenge reluctance to image for breast pain alone.

In the controversy surrounding using breast pain as a reason for diagnostic imaging, researchers find cancers may manifest in the absence of other signs or symptoms. During a study presented Thursday at the RSNA meeting, researchers found eight of 500 women seeking breast exams for breast pain were diagnosed with breast cancer.

Breast pain is one of the most common reasons prompting a breast exam, according to Dr. Lauren Stein, from the University of Michigan, who presented the study. The reported prevalence of breast cancer in women presenting with breast pain ranges from 0% to 7%. But the literature about imaging women with breast pain is limited, hence there is some controversy regarding diagnostic imaging for breast pain.

Stein and colleagues conducted a retrospective study of 500 consecutive women referred to breast imaging for isolated breast pain. All cancer cases were reviewed to establish geographic correlation of the cancer and the site of pain. Cancers diagnosed within six months of imaging were considered acute and those diagnosed more than six months after imaging were considered subsequent.

Of the eight cancers, three were acute and five were subsequent. Diagnostic mammography was a true positive in all acute cases. The incidence of acute cancer was 0.6%; all three patients reported focal breast pain and all three cancers were in the same geographic location as the pain.

Of the subsequent cancers, four were detected by mammographic screening and one had a palpable finding with a positive mammogram.

The eight cancers were invasive ductal carcinoma (five), invasive lobular carcinoma (one), and ductal carcinoma in situ (two).

The sensitivity of two-view mammography for the detection of cancer in patients with pain was 66.7% and the negative predictive value was 99.8%.

The sensitivity of greater than two-view mammography for the detection of cancer in patients with pain was 100% and the negative predictive value was 100%.

Related to this article

See the Real-World Impact of AI in Radiology
AI has to do more than show potential. It has to deliver measurable results.The Rad AI Outcomes and Market Impact Compendium brings together real-world clinical, operational and financial evidence from health systems, academic medical centers and radiology practices using Rad AI Reporting, Impressions and Continuity.Explore results including 60+ minutes saved per radiologist shift, a 47% reduction in report error rates, 70%+ patient follow-up adherence and >7x ROI — plus, case studies showing how organizations are translating AI into greater capacity, quality and financial performance.See what AI built specifically for radiology can deliver in practice.