Digital breast tomosynthesis screening found more cancers than mammography, and reduced recall rates.
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in cancer screening significantly decreases recall rate (RR) and finds more cancers than 2D mammography, according to a study published in Radiology.
Researchers from Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA, performed a prospective study to compare the recall and cancer detection rates (CDRs) between DBT and 2D mammography. The study included 85,852 asymptomatic women who underwent breast cancer screening at the researchers’ facility from 2011 to 2014.
After a DBT unit became available in the facility, women presenting for screening were assigned to either DBT or 2D mammography according to the first available machine. At the end of the study, 5,703 (6.6%) of the women had undergone DBT examinations and 80,149 (93.4%) 2D mammography examinations. Ten breast-subspecialized radiologists interpreted most of the examinations (90%).[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"44158","attributes":{"alt":"breast imaging","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_5628363967761","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"4919","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 120px; width: 120px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©karelnoppe/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The results showed that the DBT subgroup contained a higher proportion of patients with risk factors for breast cancer and baseline examinations. Screening with DBT found more carcinomas (54.3%) than did 2D mammography. The recall rate was also lower with DBT, at 6.10%, compared with 2D mammography at 54.3%. “The DBT subgroup demonstrated a significantly lower RR for patients with extremely or heterogeneously dense breasts and for patients in their 5th and 7th decades,” the authors wrote.
The researchers concluded that implementing DBT into breast screening programs provided a decrease in RR and increased CDR.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.