Almost half of primary care physicians in California are unaware of the state’s Breast Density Notification Law, which was enacted in 2013.
Many primary care clinicians in California are not familiar with the California Breast Density Notification Law and many do not feel comfortable answering breast density-related patient questions, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, in Sacramento performed an online survey to determine the level of awareness of the California Breast Density Notification Law and its impact on primary care practice.
A total of 174 online surveys were distributed to internal medicine, family medicine, and obstetric-gynecology outpatient physicians within a single primary network system 10 months after the law took effect. The 10-question survey comprised yes/no, multiple-choice, and Likert-style questions.
Seventy-seven physicians responded:
• Internal medicine: 39%
• Family medicine: 47%
• Obstetrics-gynecology: 9%
“Roughly half of those surveyed (49 percent) reported no knowledge of the breast density notification legislation,” the authors wrote. “Only 32 percent of respondents noted an increase in patient levels of concern about breast density compared to prior years.”
In response to questions about their comfort levels when responding to questions about breast density, 55% responded that they were “somewhat comfortable,” 12% said they were “not comfortable,” and 32% had referred patients to a breast health clinic for these discussions. “A total of 75 percent of those surveyed would be interested in more specific education on the subject,” the authors added.
The researchers concluded that almost half of primary care physicians in California were not aware of the new breast density notification law and many were not comfortable discussing and answering patient about breast density.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.