While women choose radiology for intellectual stimulation and job satisfaction, they consistently have to overcome the stereotype of the nurturing caregiver, according to survey results presented Monday.
While women choose radiology for intellectual stimulation and job satisfaction, they consistently have to overcome the stereotype of the nurturing caregiver, according to survey results presented Monday.
Medical student Ellie Pack and colleagues at New Jersey Medical School queried by mail 1203 female radiology residents in the U.S. They asked for the opinions the residents held about radiology as they were making a specialty choice.
While malpractice concerns ranked high on the designed survey, a surprise finding came in unsolicited written comments. Respondents wrote that they had been consistently chided by family, friends, and attendings for entering a specialty that wouldn't take advantage of their "bubbly" personality.
One respondent wrote that others told her she would be wasting herself in radiology because she is so good with people. Another comment posited that societal pressure - spoken and unspoken - insists that female physicians should be first and foremost caregivers.
"During medical school, female students were very strongly encouraged to pursue primary care or other poorly compensated fields," one respondent wrote. "People would say that such and such is a good specialty for women. But I never once heard such restrictive advice for my male colleagues."
This attitude appeared pervasive among respondents who chose to add additional comments to the survey, Pack said.
"It was a revelation to us," she said.
The designed survey garnered a 34% response rate. Most responses to other topics were evenly divided between being major concerns and not. These categories included accommodations for different stages of motherhood, the perceived male-dominated culture of the specialty, radiation exposure, and contact with mentors.
"Interestingly, respondents who did have a female mentor during medical school were less concerned with the male-dominated culture during residency than those who did not," Pack said.
A majority of respondents in Pack's survey viewed limited patient interaction as an attraction rather than a deterrent, with only 32% expressing misgivings about this matter. But the lack of patient interaction plays a major role for those who do not choose radiology as a career, according to another study by Dr. Julia Fielding and colleagues from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
In a survey mailed to third- and fourth-year medical students, Fielding and colleagues garnered a 58% response rate (nearly evenly split between men and women). Slightly more than half of respondents did not consider radiology a possible career (54 females and 42 males). Of this group, 51 women and 41 men reported lack of direct patient contact as the most important factor in deciding against radiology.
Fielding noted one-third of female respondents found radiology too competitive. She suggested early meetings with medical students to impress upon them that radiology is an attainable career.
The 22% of students who had chosen radiology as their career (10 female, 19 male) cited intellectual stimulation and job satisfaction as the most important factors for their choice.
"In order to attract high-caliber students, and particularly women, medical students should be exposed to those areas of radiology involving patient interaction such as pediatrics, mammography, and interventional procedures," Fielding said.
She also said that students should be exposed to radiology earlier in their schooling, before rumors of competitiveness and other radiology myths take hold.
Can MRI-Based AI Bolster Biopsy Decision-Making in PI-RADS 3 Cases?
December 9th 2024In patients with PI-RADS 3 lesion assessments, the combination of AI and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) level achieved a 78 percent sensitivity and 93 percent negative predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to research presented at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
New Interventional Radiology Research Shows Merits of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee OA
December 3rd 2024In a cohort of over 160 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), including grade 4 in nearly half of the cases, genicular artery embolization led to an 87 percent improvement in the quality of life index, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Siemens Healthineers Debuts New Photon-Counting CT Systems at RSNA
December 2nd 2024Debuting at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference, the new photon-counting computed tomography (PPCT) scanners Naeotom Alpha.Pro and Naeotom Alpha.Prime reportedly combine rapid scan times with high-resolution precision.