Case of patient left in PET/CT scanner reveals lessons in care

October 30, 2007

An Arizona woman will always remember the incident that was nearly as frightening as learning that she had cancer. The incident was being left inside a PET/CT scanner after the imaging center was locked up and staff had gone for the day.

An Arizona woman will always remember the incident that was nearly as frightening as learning that she had cancer. The incident was being left inside a PET/CT scanner after the imaging center was locked up and staff had gone for the day.

Elvira Tellez, a 67-year-old bone cancer patient from Tucson, was scheduled to undergo a CT exam for metastatic disease in a PET/CT scanner. On Sept. 19, she arrived at Arizona Oncology, a cancer care medical group with 23 facilities statewide that is affiliated with national healthcare network US Oncology.

A nurse and an imaging technologist prepared her for the exam and placed her inside the scanner at about 4 p.m. They turned the lights down so she could relax and asked her not to move. Time passed. The room darkened further when the sun set at 6:25, but, according to Tellez, no one came to remove her from the scanner tube.

Tellez, who speaks little English, told Diagnostic Imaging in an exclusive phone interview conducted in Spanish that she had asked the technologist how long the scan would take.

"The technologist said, 'No more than 20 minutes.' But they left me inside for five hours," she said.

According to local media reports, Tellez called for help when she felt she had been in the scanner too long. With some difficulty, she crawled out of the machine to find she was locked in the clinic as well. Police arrived after a 911 call from her son. She was taken to a hospital for assessment and soon released.

Language difficulties did not factor into incident, according to Tellez. The technologist spoke Spanish, and she had good communications with her personal physicians. In the aftermath, Tellez complained of sleeping difficulties and other problems, though she said she was not contemplating legal action.

Arizona Oncology published an apology on its website a week after the incident, noting that the staff member involved with the case had also personally apologized to Tellez.

The statement assured patients that an evaluation was completed within 24 hours of the event. It said that the scan was completed successfully and that Tellez had not been in danger of radiation overexposure. New procedures were established, including a complete facility sweep and implementation of checks and balances to be completed before the clinic's daily lockdown, the statement said.

Kimberly Rutherford, director of corporate and marketing communications for US Oncology, declined Diagnostic Imaging's request for an interview, citing Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act patient privacy concerns.

Such incidents offer a lesson for anyone who cares for imaging patients, according to Cindi Luckett-Gilbert, advocacy chair of the SNM's Technologist Section. Nuclear medicine and radiologic technologists receive quality control and quality assurance education specific to their fields. Regardless of training or specialty, however, they should follow through with their patients from beginning to end.

"Patient care includes gathering all the history, making sure there are no medication contraindications, explaining everything, doing the scan, getting the pictures checked, and walking the patient out," she said.

Radiologic technologists take the same view. All radiologic technology training programs teach students that patients should be walked out of the procedure room and into the dressing room, said Linda Racki, RT, a safety compliance officer at Saint Francis Medical Center's imaging department in Peoria, IL.

All rooms in a clinic should be checked before closing. Policies and procedures should stipulate a physical indicator, accepted by all staff, showing that a room has been checked. If the technologist had been relieved by someone else, some type of hand-off communications - as described in the 2007 Joint Commision Safety Goals - should be made between the two staff members, Racki said.

For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:

Glut of incidental lesions leaves little time to achieve reporting consensus

Errors continue to plague communication of abnormal imaging results

Scan time leases: Referring clinicians mine for gold in radiology's backyard

Quality issue must move beyond mammography