Fleischner Society outlines suggestions for when chest imaging can beneficially contribute to infection management.
Even though industry consensus discourages the use of chest imaging for COVID-19 diagnosis, the role of both chest X-Ray (CXR) and chest CT continues to emerge. In an effort to provide clarity for implementing imaging, the international Fleischner Society published a consensus statement Tuesday, offering suggestions for scenarios where chest imaging is appropriate.
The 10-nation panel included representatives from the countries carrying the heaviest COVID-19 burden: the United States, Italy, China, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, South Korea, Canada, and Japan. The group included 15 thoracic radiologists, 10 pulmonologists/intensivists, and 1 pathologist, as well as experts in emergency medicine, infection control, and laboratory medicine. They published their consensus statement simultaneously in Radiology and Chest.
The panel acknowledged that the clinical body of knowledge surrounding COVID-19 is growing and rapidly changing, adding that the agreed-upon recommendations represent the most actionable information available to date.
“We need to understand that conditions across the globe vary greatly,” said Geoffrey D. Rubin, M.D., George B. Geller Professor of Cardiovascular Research and professor of radiology and bioengineering at Duke University School of Medicine. “Our goal in developing this statement was to offer guidance that is sensitive to these differences and applicable broadly.”
To provide the clearest guidance, the group offered imaging suggestions based on three clinical scenarios with differing risk factors, community conditions, and resource constraints – a patient with mild COVID-19 features, a patient with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 features, and a patient with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 features in a resource-limited environment.
All guidance applies to adult patients who have presented with features consistent with COVID-19 infection.
Based on their discussions, the panel drafted five main recommendations, as well as three additional suggestions.
Overall, the panel offered this guidance:
In addition, the panel offered these additional suggestions:
The group reiterated that these guidelines are based on the best information gathered and could be changed in the future.
“[This statement] represents opinion at a moment in time within a highly dynamic environment where the status of regional epidemics and the availability of critical resources to combat those epidemics vary daily,” the team said. “The evidence base supporting the use of imaging across the scenarios presented is scant, and the advice presented herein may undergo refinement through rigorous scientific investigation, exposing nuances of image interpretation that may lead to prognostic information and guide management decisions.”
Ultimately, Rubin said, new roles for thoracic imaging could emerge in establishing treatment response or in characterizing patients that might be good responders to novel therapies.
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
Meta-Analysis Shows Merits of AI with CTA Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Calcified Plaque
April 16th 2025Artificial intelligence demonstrated higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than radiologists for detecting coronary artery stenosis > 50 percent on computed tomography angiography (CTA), according to a new 17-study meta-analysis.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).