Breast MRI suffered from a serious image problem during the second half of the 1990s. Because of its limited specificity and high cost, the technique was written off by many specialists, but clinical acceptance of it has increased over the past few years. It is now widely recognized as a valuable adjunct to mammography and ultrasound.
Breast MRI suffered from a serious image problem during the second half of the 1990s. Because of its limited specificity and high cost, the technique was written off by many specialists, but clinical acceptance of it has increased over the past few years. It is now widely recognized as a valuable adjunct to mammography and ultrasound.
High-resolution images can be acquired routinely with 1.5T and 3T scanners in less than 40 minutes. MRI breast biopsy devices are commercially available, and the protocol has been standardized. Some hospitals still image one breast per examination, which is time-consuming and inefficient, but new hardware and software allow both breasts to be examined at the same session.
Breast MR still must be used selectively, as Dr. Ingvar Andersson, associate professor of radiology in Malmo, Sweden, told delegates at the 9th Asian Oceanian Congress of Radiology in Singapore. He uses breast MRI only for selected patients: those with suspicious physical findings and dense breasts that are difficult to interpret on mammography, ultrasound, and needle biopsy; those with one focus of breast cancer who are candidates for conservative surgery but have difficult-to-interpret mammograms and ultrasound scans; those with post-treatment changes after conservative surgery and irradiation that cannot be evaluated with established techniques; those with silicone implants; and those with metastatic disease in the axilla and negative mammography and ultrasonography.
"Routine follow-up of patients who have been treated for breast cancer and monitoring of the response to therapy, in particular chemotherapy, are relative indications for MRI, but they are not yet fully established," he said. "We do not recommend MRI for patients with dense mammograms without suspicion of malignancy or for patients with 'cancerophobia' but without suspicion of malignancy on conventional methods."
As an introduction to the topic, Dr. Fong Tsai's article this issue is recommended reading. The author describes his positive experiences with a dedicated system that might be of interest to other readers. Such systems have their skeptics, but they may be worth a second look.
In our next Asia Pacific edition, we will be publishing a follow-up article from Hong Kong about high-field breast MRI. Very high spatial and temporal resolution can be obtained by partnering 3T with parallel imaging techniques, and the high spatial resolution enhances the morphologic features of lesions and increases diagnostic confidence. Further improvements in sensitivity and specificity are expected as radiologists gain more experience in working with 3T.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
FDA Clears Enhanced MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System
June 5th 2025An alternative to an open neurosurgical approach, the Visualase V2 MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System reportedly utilizes laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for targeted soft tissue ablation in patients with brain tumors and focal epilepsy.
Possible Real-Time Adaptive Approach to Breast MRI Suggests ‘New Era’ of AI-Directed MRI
June 3rd 2025Assessing the simulated use of AI-generated suspicion scores for determining whether one should continue with full MRI or shift to an abbreviated MRI, the authors of a new study noted comparable sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for biopsies between the MRI approaches.