The HIPAA contingency plan devised by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should allow the industry the additional time it needs to prepare for implementation of the Transaction and Code Sets regulation. But the plan is also crucial to
The HIPAA contingency plan devised by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should allow the industry the additional time it needs to prepare for implementation of the Transaction and Code Sets regulation. But the plan is also crucial to maintaining continuity of care and reimbursement for Medicare patients, according to the results of a new Healthcare Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) survey.
The CMS announced in September that it was implementing a contingency plan to accept noncompliant electronic transactions after the Oct. 16 compliance deadline for the HIPAA regulation. The decision was based on a CMS review of statistics showing that an unacceptably low number of compliant claims were being submitted.
Fifty-six percent of survey respondents indicated that the contingency plan will forestall an imminent crisis and allow many facilities to become compliant.
Seventy-six percent of the respondents indicated that the plan is crucial to enable providers to maintain their operations, as well as to ensure that care for Medicare patients will not be interrupted.
According to respondents, the CMS should leave its contingency plan in place for at least 30 days (6%), 30 to 90 days (21%), three to six months (42%), six to 12 months (26%), or more than a year (3%).
The survey also asked whether other payers should offer contingency plans. Payers have not been consistent in their reactions to CMS's September announcement.
Blue Cross Blue Shield, for instance, has indicated that it will offer a contingency plan, while others say they will revert to a paper-based system. About half (55%) of the survey respondents believe this diverse response will lead to a delay in HIPAA compliance.
To mitigate confusion, HIMSS recommends that entities do the following:
· maintain their current contingency plan, and do not assume there will be a lengthy reprieve;
· continue testing and obtain firm testing dates from all trading partners;
· review and follow the contingency plan for claims submissions for Medicare and Medicaid if they have not successfully tested with the CMS to date;
· contact other payers to determine their readiness and whether they will accept noncompliant transactions;
· secure a copy of trading partners' contingency plan;
· document everything they have done to become compliant, especially their determination of what contingency planning needs to be done; and
· consider contracting with a third-party vendor that specializes in testing and certification for HIPAA compliance to help determine whether their transactions or those of their trading partners are compliant.
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
New Collaboration Offers Promise of Automating Prior Authorizations in Radiology with AI
March 26th 2025In addition to a variety of tools to promote radiology workflow efficiencies, the integration of the Gravity AI tools into the PowerServer RIS platform may reduce time-consuming prior authorizations to minutes for completion.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.