Radiology needs to be cautious as teleradiology business expands
Not too long ago, the only way to really squeeze a hospital-based radiology group was to threaten to throw it out and hire another local radiology group. Understandably, that didn't happen often.
That option still exists, but it's been joined by another option made available courtesy of the digital transformation of radiology-farming out work to outside groups via teleradiology.
So far, there are no indications that this is happening in any big way. Teleradiologists we interviewed for this month's cover story insist they are working only through established radiology practices or in concert with them to supply services that wouldn't otherwise be available.
But you don't have to look too hard to see how teleradiology adds a new set of factors that will put pressure on the local character of radiology practice.
Leading that list is the entry of investment capital into the financing of teleradiology practices. We've cautioned before in this space about the difference between business and medical ethics, that is, the need for profits versus the needs of patients and referring clinicians. Some will have no trouble reconciling these competing sets of values, but others, inevitably, will.
A related concern is the pressure on prices that teleradiology brings to the marketplace, particularly as the night-reading companies expand into the day-reading field. For now, it appears that service and quality remain the dominant means of competition among teleradiology firms, but some big outside forces are at play here. As the government and private insurers rachet down payments, imaging centers and hospitals may be forced to shop prices more aggressively. The widespread availability of teleradiology options makes price competition much more feasible.
Besides allowing the aggregation of night reads, teleradiology is also making possible the aggregation of specialty radiology services, either as a dedicated style of practice or as an adjunct to night-reading services. All radiologists recognize the importance and value of continuous exposure to particular modalities and pathologies. To the extent that a particular modality or pathology is sent off to specialty practices via teleradiology, opportunities for a practice to develop broader expertise can become limited. The tendency to specialize is well established in all of medicine, but teleradiology will accelerate this process in imaging practice.
Finally, when you begin to sever the link between local radiologists and some segment of the interpretation business, whether it be via night, day, or subspecialty reads, you create some new internal stresses. Hospital and radiology administrators may wonder why they should pay for both a preliminary night and a final day read. Referring clinicians may wonder why they need a local radiologist when the teleradiologist seems to be just as good or better and, perhaps, cheaper.
Of course, teleradiology has brought advantages to the practice of radiology that extend far beyond a more efficient and humane answer to the dreaded night call. Rural areas, in particular, have benefited from better access to image interpretations. In some instances, the ability to supplement local resources with outside night or day reads via teleradiology has allowed local radiology practices to keep hospital or imaging center contracts they might otherwise have had to let go. Wider access to subspecialty interpretations will probably improve the quality of specialty care.
But these gains are not without their costs. It's clear that the scope and economic significance of teleradiology have reached a point where it could begin to have significant impacts on practice. Teleradiologists and their facility-based counterparts need to consider these impacts and proceed carefully to assure that the growth of teleradiology does not undermine the quality of patient care or the strength of local radiology practice.
Comment: Radiology needs to be cautious as teleradiology business expands
Radiology needs to be cautious as teleradiology business expands
Not too long ago, the only way to really squeeze a hospital-based radiology group was to threaten to throw it out and hire another local radiology group. Understandably, that didn't happen often.
That option still exists, but it's been joined by another option made available courtesy of the digital transformation of radiology-farming out work to outside groups via teleradiology.
So far, there are no indications that this is happening in any big way. Teleradiologists we interviewed for this month's cover story insist they are working only through established radiology practices or in concert with them to supply services that wouldn't otherwise be available.
But you don't have to look too hard to see how teleradiology adds a new set of factors that will put pressure on the local character of radiology practice.
Leading that list is the entry of investment capital into the financing of teleradiology practices. We've cautioned before in this space about the difference between business and medical ethics, that is, the need for profits versus the needs of patients and referring clinicians. Some will have no trouble reconciling these competing sets of values, but others, inevitably, will.
A related concern is the pressure on prices that teleradiology brings to the marketplace, particularly as the night-reading companies expand into the day-reading field. For now, it appears that service and quality remain the dominant means of competition among teleradiology firms, but some big outside forces are at play here. As the government and private insurers rachet down payments, imaging centers and hospitals may be forced to shop prices more aggressively. The widespread availability of teleradiology options makes price competition much more feasible.
Besides allowing the aggregation of night reads, teleradiology is also making possible the aggregation of specialty radiology services, either as a dedicated style of practice or as an adjunct to night-reading services. All radiologists recognize the importance and value of continuous exposure to particular modalities and pathologies. To the extent that a particular modality or pathology is sent off to specialty practices via teleradiology, opportunities for a practice to develop broader expertise can become limited. The tendency to specialize is well established in all of medicine, but teleradiology will accelerate this process in imaging practice.
Finally, when you begin to sever the link between local radiologists and some segment of the interpretation business, whether it be via night, day, or subspecialty reads, you create some new internal stresses. Hospital and radiology administrators may wonder why they should pay for both a preliminary night and a final day read. Referring clinicians may wonder why they need a local radiologist when the teleradiologist seems to be just as good or better and, perhaps, cheaper.
Of course, teleradiology has brought advantages to the practice of radiology that extend far beyond a more efficient and humane answer to the dreaded night call. Rural areas, in particular, have benefited from better access to image interpretations. In some instances, the ability to supplement local resources with outside night or day reads via teleradiology has allowed local radiology practices to keep hospital or imaging center contracts they might otherwise have had to let go. Wider access to subspecialty interpretations will probably improve the quality of specialty care.
But these gains are not without their costs. It's clear that the scope and economic significance of teleradiology have reached a point where it could begin to have significant impacts on practice. Teleradiologists and their facility-based counterparts need to consider these impacts and proceed carefully to assure that the growth of teleradiology does not undermine the quality of patient care or the strength of local radiology practice.
What a New MRI Meta-Analysis Reveals About AI-Powered Hippocampal Segmentation and Alzheimer’s Disease
While AI-enabled hippocampal segmentation on MRI offered a 95 percent AUC for differentiating between Alzheimer’s disease and normal controls in a 27-study meta-analysis, it offered significantly lower sensitivity and specificity in differentiating mild cognitive impairment.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Insights on Recent Research About Radiation-Induced Cancers with CT Scans, Part 2
In a second part of a new podcast episode on recently published research on projected radiation-induced cancers from computed tomography (CT) scans, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., and Joseph Cavallo, M.D., offer current perspectives on cardiac CT dosing, AI advances and the importance of teamwork in ensuring appropriate dosing for CT.
Study Shows No Impact of Hormone Therapy on PET/CT with 18F-Piflufolastat in PCa Imaging
For patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer, new research findings showed no significant difference in the sensitivity of 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT between patients on concurrent hormone therapy and those without hormone therapy.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Insights on Recent Research About Radiation-Induced Cancers with CT Scans, Part 1
In a new podcast, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., and Joseph Cavallo, M.D., share their perspectives on recently published research looking at projections for future radiation-induced cancers from computed tomography (CT) scans.
CT-Based Risk Scoring System Outperforms AJCC TNM Staging for Predicting Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
In comparison to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging, an emerging CT-based scoring system for assessing early recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrated over a 22 percent higher AUC in testing and external validation cohorts in a new study.
FDA Clears Dual-Head SPECT/CT System with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction
The combination of the Aurora SPECT/CT system with AI-enabled Clarify DL image reconstruction reportedly offers the potential of enhanced image quality and streamlined workflows in nuclear medicine.
What a New MRI Meta-Analysis Reveals About AI-Powered Hippocampal Segmentation and Alzheimer’s Disease
While AI-enabled hippocampal segmentation on MRI offered a 95 percent AUC for differentiating between Alzheimer’s disease and normal controls in a 27-study meta-analysis, it offered significantly lower sensitivity and specificity in differentiating mild cognitive impairment.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Insights on Recent Research About Radiation-Induced Cancers with CT Scans, Part 2
In a second part of a new podcast episode on recently published research on projected radiation-induced cancers from computed tomography (CT) scans, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., and Joseph Cavallo, M.D., offer current perspectives on cardiac CT dosing, AI advances and the importance of teamwork in ensuring appropriate dosing for CT.
Study Shows No Impact of Hormone Therapy on PET/CT with 18F-Piflufolastat in PCa Imaging
For patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer, new research findings showed no significant difference in the sensitivity of 18F-piflufolastat PET/CT between patients on concurrent hormone therapy and those without hormone therapy.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Insights on Recent Research About Radiation-Induced Cancers with CT Scans, Part 1
In a new podcast, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, Ph.D., and Joseph Cavallo, M.D., share their perspectives on recently published research looking at projections for future radiation-induced cancers from computed tomography (CT) scans.
CT-Based Risk Scoring System Outperforms AJCC TNM Staging for Predicting Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
In comparison to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging, an emerging CT-based scoring system for assessing early recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrated over a 22 percent higher AUC in testing and external validation cohorts in a new study.
FDA Clears Dual-Head SPECT/CT System with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction
The combination of the Aurora SPECT/CT system with AI-enabled Clarify DL image reconstruction reportedly offers the potential of enhanced image quality and streamlined workflows in nuclear medicine.