CHICAGO - Communicating urgent findings are critical to patient safety, but it’s those not-so-urgent findings that don’t always make it to the right physician at the right time for effective follow up. Paul Chang, MD, of the University of Chicago Medical Center, found radiologists were doing a pretty good job getting the urgent results to the referring physician but needed a solution for effectively communicating surveillance results.
CHICAGO - Communicating urgent findings are critical to patient safety, but it’s those not-so-urgent findings that don’t always make it to the right physician at the right time for effective follow up.
That’s what Paul Chang, MD, radiology professor and vice chair of radiology informatics at the University of Chicago Medical Center, was finding in his department. Radiologists were doing a pretty good job getting the urgent results to the referring physician through a phone call or in the report.
“We do OK on life threatening emergent results,” he said, speaking on a panel at RSNA Tuesday. But those less immediate surveillance findings, like a lung nodule, that may need physician follow up in several months rather than in a few seconds or minutes can slip through the cracks or be easily ignored.
For those results, that phone call interrupting the referring physician wasn’t appropriate. In fact, Chang found that different results required different modes of communication. He took a note from his kids who use several different methods, from Twitter to Skype to Facebook to text messaging, depending on the message and to whom it was being delivered. Radiologists should do the same depending on the level of urgency of the finding and look beyond the phone call and the report. “One size doesn’t fit all,” he said.
Chang developed a priority matrix, matching the appropriate method of communication to the clinical context. Life threatening, emergent results warrant a phone call. For emergent findings, where it’s not seconds, but perhaps hours, a radiologist could replace that phone call with a system that triggers an alarm in the ER or ICU, alerting of the finding. The alarm doesn’t stop until someone acknowledges the results, Chang said, referring to a system built into the PACS that his department uses and has proven even more effective than a phone call.
But what about that important, yet not time sensitive finding? That’s similar to the knowledge that in April you’ll have to file your income taxes, Chang said. Imagine paging or calling a physician with that knowledge. “What will I do with that?” he asked, adding it’s not appropriate to interrupt a physician immediately with that long-term knowledge. But give them an electronic alarm notification and it will go ignored.
Solving this level of communication proved to be the most difficult, Chang said. Even building a database that flagged physicians for follow up wasn’t effective.
The solution? Communicate with the patient. This happens with breast imaging patients, so why not others? Patients will tend to follow up on their own healthcare.
“Patients don’t blow off these messages,” he said, adding his department has just started this process. “We have suspended all this fancy software, and instead we get a certified letter to patient,” suggesting they communicate with their ordering physician about a result they found on the imaging scan.
AI Facilitates Nearly 83 Percent Improvement in Turnaround Time for Fracture X-Rays
December 19th 2023In addition to offering a 98.5 percent sensitivity rate in diagnosing fractures on X-ray, an emerging artificial intelligence (AI) software reportedly helped reduce mean turnaround time on X-ray fracture diagnosis from 48 hours to 8.3 hours, according to new research presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can an Emerging PET Radiotracer Enhance Detection of Prostate Cancer Recurrence?
December 14th 2023The use of 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI demonstrated a 35 percent higher sensitivity rate than MRI alone for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, according to research recently presented at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
Can AI Improve Detection of Extraprostatic Extension on MRI?
December 4th 2023Utilizing a deep learning-based AI algorithm to differentiate between diagnostic and non-diagnostic quality of prostate MRI facilitated a 10 percent higher specificity rate for diagnosing extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Study: Regular Mammography Screening Reduces Breast Cancer Mortality Risk by More than 70 Percent
November 30th 2023Consistent adherence to the five most recent mammography screenings prior to a breast cancer diagnosis reduced breast cancer death risk by 72 percent in comparison to women who did not have the mammography screening, according to new research findings presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.