A conebeam breast CT scanner is producing exquisite 3D images and enabling visualization of tiny calcifications, but further work is needed to reduce radiation dose and improve system design.
A conebeam breast CT scanner is producing exquisite 3D images and enabling visualization of tiny calcifications, but further work is needed to reduce radiation dose and improve system design.
"Conebeam CT is not ready for prime time yet, as some want to believe. But it's a great tool," said Dr. Posy Seifert, a managing partner at the Elizabeth Wende Breast Clinic in Rochester, NY.
Seifert's clinic is participating in a multicenter trial of an investigational conebeam CT scanner developed at the University of Rochester. A commercial version of the scanner is set to be marketed for diagnostic purposes by Koning of Henrietta, NY.
The scanner features a horizontal gantry with a conebeam CT imaging chain. The gantry, which includes a flat-panel detector, is mounted under the patient table. The patient lies face down on the table and a single breast hangs freely through a table cut-out. The x-ray tube rotates around the breast, and a standard 10-second scan produces 300 projection images.
Unenhanced breast CT was equal to or better than digital mammography, according to a pilot study of 20 screening cases and nine cancer cases. Seifert presented results at the 2006 RSNA meeting. Conebeam CT proved powerful in displaying anatomy and was better in assessing breast density and more accurate at measuring tumor size. Breast coverage was at least as good with breast CT as with digital mammography. The results suggest conebeam CT did not improve specificity, and researchers believe contrast could help in this respect.
Because the scanner obtains tiny slices, resolution is very high and calcifications are well visualized. In contrast, breast MRI, another alternative study, takes much longer to perform and is not well suited for calcifications.
However, the radiation dose used to produce the conebeam CT images was twice as high as with a standard mammogram. Researchers are now working to reduce the dose without sacrificing image quality. More work is also needed to improve the ergonomic design of the CT table to accommodate women of different sizes, Seifert said.
Mammography and Breast MRI: Is it Time to Evaluate Strategies as Opposed to Modalities?
July 5th 2024The combination of mammography with breast MRI within 90 days had a 96.2 percent sensitivity in comparison to 48.1 percent for mammography and 79.7 percent for breast MRI performed within 91 to 270 days after index mammography, according to newly published research.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.