Ductal carcinoma in situ often takes on an innocent guise in the mainstream media. It may be referred to as "precancerous" or "mostly harmless." Some say this common malignancy is overdiagnosed and overtreated.
Ductal carcinoma in situ often takes on an innocent guise in the mainstream media. It may be referred to as "precancerous" or "mostly harmless." Some say this common malignancy is overdiagnosed and overtreated.
In this month's cover story, a more complex picture emerges. Pathology experts say that DCIS is similar to invasive cancer in terms of its makeup and heterogeneous nature.
Furthermore, Dr. Laszlo Tabar, a leader in mammography education, has identified some cancers now classified as DCIS that actually behave like invasive cancer, possibly through a process called neoductgenesis.
For Tabar, misunderstandings about what DCIS is and is capable of becoming start with faulty terminology and outdated anatomical models. Newer pathology techniques showed several years ago that DCIS is often found not in the collecting ducts, but in the terminal ductal lobular units, which include the lobules and the terminal ducts.
The origin of in situ disease has implications for its likelihood of become invasive, according to pathologists.
It proved somewhat difficult to get leading radiologists to comment for this story. Most were more comfortable directing me to breast pathology experts such as Dr. Michael Lagios, conveniently based in Diagnostic Imaging's hometown, San Francisco.
Both Tabar and Lagios stress the importance of correlating mammographic findings with actual pathology findings. Ideally, the two specialists should become au fait with one another's terminology.
At a multidisciplinary seminar held in June, Tabar demonstrated the cooperative approach with pathologist Dr. Lee Tucker of the Carilion Breast Center in Roanoke, VA. The two experts believe that collaboration with modern pathology techniques can result in more accurate diagnosis and assessment of disease, with obvious benefits to patients in terms of more appropriate treatment.
Such an entwined working relationship is uncommon today but holds potential in the future, as more centers embrace specialized, interdisciplinary models for breast cancer management.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.