Injected contrast improved liver ultrasound sensitivity and specificity in malignant liver lesions, aiding diagnosis in 13.7% of cases in a French study. Researchers concluded that contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be routine practice when considering surgical management of hepatic lesions.
Injected contrast improved liver ultrasound sensitivity and specificity in malignant liver lesions, aiding diagnosis in 13.7% of cases in a French study. Researchers concluded that contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be routine practice when considering surgical management of hepatic lesions.
Dr. Linda Chami and colleagues at the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif examined 116 patients, first with conventional ultrasound, then with contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with perfusion software - either vascular recognition or pulse subtraction imaging. Histological results served as the standard for judging sensitivity and specificity for both exams.
The researchers published their study in the March issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Of the 116 patients, 82 were treated surgically, 31 didn't qualify for surgery because of disseminated lesions, and three didn't meet the study's inclusion criteria. Surgery identified 306 hepatic lesions, and histopathologic analysis showed 233 were malignant and 73 benign.
Baseline sonography detected a total of 147 lesions, while contrast-enhanced sonography detected 177. When compared with the histological results, contrast-enhanced sonography detected 23 more malignant lesions than did the baseline exam. These had been identified as lacunae at the portal venous phase and benign nodules on baseline sonography.
The researchers found that contrast-enhanced ultrasound had a sensitivity of 68.7% and specificity of 67%, while baseline ultrasound had a sensitivity of 58.8% and specificity of 50.7%.
Injected contrast improved liver ultrasound exam results in 13.7% of cases. The researchers concluded that it should become part of routine assessment of hepatic lesions prior to surgery.
MRI or Ultrasound for Evaluating Pelvic Endometriosis?: Seven Takeaways from a New Literature Review
September 13th 2024While noting the strength of MRI for complete staging of disease and ultrasound’s ability to provide local disease characterization, the authors of a new literature review suggest the two modalities offer comparable results for diagnosing pelvic endometriosis.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
FDA Clears Controlled Contrast Delivery Method for Ultrasound Imaging of Fallopian Tubes
September 9th 2024Facilitating natural contrast delivery through an intrauterine catheter, FemChec can be utilized for ultrasound assessment of fallopian tubes and may provide diagnostic confirmation for an emerging non-surgical option for permanent birth control.
FDA Clears Emerging Cardiovascular Point-of-Care Ultrasound Platform
August 22nd 2024Combining four CAD modules for valvular pathologies with a variety of automated measurements, the AI-enabled AISAP Cardio ultrasound system reportedly facilitates up to a 90 percent accuracy rate in detecting common cardiac conditions.
Predicting DCIS Upgrade to Invasive Breast Cancer: Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Have an Impact?
August 21st 2024Adding two key findings from contrast-enhanced ultrasound to a predictive model of mammography, conventional ultrasound and clinicopathological findings led to a 86.1 percent AUROC for predicting the upgrading of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer, according to new research.