Including contrast MR imaging can help physicians differentiate between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis.
Contrast-enhanced MRI can differentiate between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis among children, and may help guide management decisions in the work-up of pediatric appendicitis, according to a study published in Pediatric Radiology.
Researchers from New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, in New York, performed a retrospective review to assess the performance of MRI in differentiating perforated from non-perforated pediatric appendicitis.
The review evaluated the records of 77 patients (mean age 12.2 years) with appendicitis. Twenty-two of the children had perforation. The researchers assessed: appendiceal restricted diffusion, wall defect, appendicolith, periappendiceal free fluid, remote free fluid, restricted diffusion within free fluid, abscess, peritoneal enhancement, ileocecal wall thickening, and ileus.
The results showed that the children who had perforations had a larger mean appendiceal diameter and mean number of MRI findings than the non-perforated group:
Abscess, wall defect, and restricted diffusion within free fluid had the greatest specificity for perforation (1.00, 1.00, and 0.96, respectively) but low sensitivity (0.36, 0.25, and 0.32, respectively). The receiver operator characteristic curve for total number of MRI findings had an area under the curve of 0.92, with an optimal threshold of 3.5. A threshold of any four findings had the best ability to accurately discriminate between perforated and non-perforated cases, with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 85%.
The researchers concluded that contrast-enhanced MRI can differentiate perforated from non-perforated appendicitis and the presence of multiple findings increases diagnostic accuracy, with a threshold of any four findings optimally discriminating between perforated and non-perforated cases.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
July 25th 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
July 22nd 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 2
July 23rd 2025In the second part of a multi-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, discuss key sequences for abbreviated breast MRI and how it stacks up to other breast cancer screening modalities.
Stroke MRI Study Assesses Impact of Motion Artifacts Upon AI and Radiologist Lesion Detection
July 16th 2025Noting a 7.4 percent incidence of motion artifacts on brain MRI scans for suspected stroke patients, the authors of a new study found that motion artifacts can reduce radiologist and AI accuracy for detecting hemorrhagic lesions.