Not just radiologists but everyone, including patients and referring physicians, needs education on the benefits and risks of radiation exposure from medical imaging studies. That was the conclusion in a nutshell of a memo sent by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements to the imaging community.
Not just radiologists but everyone, including patients and referring physicians, needs education on the benefits and risks of radiation exposure from medical imaging studies. That was the conclusion in a nutshell of a memo sent by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements to the imaging community.
Radiologists, physicists, nuclear medicine physicians, geneticists, and other radiation protection experts gathered in April near Washington, DC, for the council's 2007 meeting. Participants unveiled preliminary findings of an NCRP scientific committee study showing that the amount of radiation dose the U.S. population is receiving from clinical imaging may have increased more than 600% over the last two decades. The study also found that CT scanning, which accounts for about 10% of all imaging procedures, is responsible for almost half of the total estimated effective dose.
"It's no longer sufficient to restrict radiation safety education to radiologists alone," said coauthor Mythreyi Bhargavan, Ph.D., director of research for the American College of Radiology.
Bhargavan also supplied the NCRP with an analysis on imaging utilization trends based on data from public and private sources, including Medicare, the VA, IMV, and Blue Cross Blue Shield. Some trends were evident:
Hospitals have the staff and guidelines required to manage imaging equipment and radiation safety that outpatient office settings generally lack. This discrepancy indicates where education efforts should start, but everybody needs a reminder, Bhargavan said.
Radiologists learn the ropes during residency, but they may neglect to calculate doses once in practice. Medical students need to learn what they are subjecting their patients to. Emergency physicians, though under a great deal of pressure, must be aware of the dose factor and contemplate alternative imaging procedures. Referring physicians need to be aware of what they are prescribing to their patients. And patients should understand the risks versus the benefits of an imaging exam before they either demand or fear having one, she said.
Can AI Bolster Breast Cancer Detection in DBT Screening?
January 16th 2025In sequential breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), true positive examinations had more than double the AI case score of true negative examinations and the highest positive AI score changes from previous exams, according to new research.
CT Study Reveals Key Indicators for Angiolymphatic Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
January 15th 2025In computed tomography (CT) scans for patients with solid non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) < 30 mm, emerging research suggests the lollipop sign is associated with a greater than fourfold likelihood of angiolymphatic invasion.
Can MRI-Based AI Enhance Risk Stratification in Prostate Cancer?
January 13th 2025Employing baseline MRI and clinical data, an emerging deep learning model was 32 percent more likely to predict the progression of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) to clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to new research.