An Italian investigation suggests virtual colonography is a better follow-up test for failed colonoscopy than a double-contrast barium enema.
An Italian investigation suggests virtual colonography is a better follow-up test for failed colonoscopy than a double-contrast barium enema.
Dr. Lapo Sali of the radiodiagnostic section within the department of clinical physiopathology at the University of Florence and colleagues conducted a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in Tuscany (World J Gastroenterol 2008;14[28]:4499-4504).
During the one-year screening process, 43,290 individuals underwent a fecal occult blood test. About 4.3%, or 1882 subjects, were positive. Of those patients, 77.7%, or 1463 patients, underwent colonoscopy. The rest refused.
Sali and colleagues found 7.2%, or 65, of the colonoscopies were incomplete, and 42 of these subjects then underwent CTC, which correctly identified two colonic masses and 20 polyps.
The data suggest CTC should be the “go to” method after a colonoscopy fails, especially since the process is easier than a double-contrast barium enema.
Other researchers have conducted studies on CTC after incomplete colonoscopy, but the studies included asymptomatic as well as symptomatic subjects, according to Sali and colleagues.
The results for medium-sized polyps (6 to 9 mm), with a per-lesion positive predictive value of 77.8%, might be due to thinner collimation for CT scanning and double reading of the examinations, the researchers said.
In addition to failed colonoscopies, the researchers noticed a high number of false-positive results, which led to unnecessary repeat colonoscopy. They suggest fecal tagging to reduce the number of false positives.
Sali’s study is nothing earth-shattering, according to Dr. Judy Yee, vice chair of radiology and biomedical imaging at the University of California, San Francisco, but it confirms the American Cancer Society’s and American College of Radiology’s recommendations from May that CTC is useful for colon cancer screening.
“CTC has a couple of advantages over a barium enema,” Yee said. “It’s easier on the patient, and you can view a portion of the colon not seen on barium enema.”
Barium is a thick liquid, difficult to administer, and it often won’t coat the colon adequately, Yee said.
“Additionally, CTC is shown to be more accurate for identifying polyps,” she said.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
CT colonography’s proven clinical worth now invites reimbursement
Available scanners tackle future CTC screening demand
Radiology societies seek Medicare coverage for CT colonography
Can CT-Based AI Provide Automated Detection of Colorectal Cancer?
February 14th 2025For the assessment of contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT exams, an artificial intelligence model demonstrated equivalent or better sensitivity than radiologist readers, and greater than 90 percent specificity for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Key Chest CT Parameters for Body Composition May be Prognostic for Patients with Resectable NSCLC
February 11th 2025A high intermuscular adipose index has a 49 percent increased likelihood of being associated with lower overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to new research.
Comparative AI Study Shows Merits of RapidAI LVO Software in Stroke Detection
February 6th 2025The Rapid LVO AI software detected 33 percent more cases of large vessel occlusion (LVO) on computed tomography angiography (CTA) than Viz LVO AI software, according to a new comparative study presented at the International Stroke Conference (ISC).
New CT Angiography Study Shows Impact of COVID-19 on Coronary Inflammation and Plaque
February 5th 2025Prior COVID-19 infection was associated with a 28 percent higher progression of total percent atheroma volume (PAV) annually and over a 5 percent higher incidence of high-risk plaque in patients with coronary artery lesions, according to CCTA findings from a new study.