Register Now: Image-Based Risk: The Next Frontier in Breast Cancer Screening
|Articles|October 1, 2006

CT colonography promotion belies gold standard preference of imagers

For the last several years, radiology imaging journals have been eager to discuss colonic assessment by CT, as in your August 2006 edition ("Multinational study cements safety of CT colonography," page 14). Like many radiologists, I attend sundry meetings and, for the last two years, have queried fellow physicians as to how they wish to be evaluated in the colon.

Less than 5% of the radiologists suggested CT evaluation. If one is to be assessed by either CT or classic colonoscopy, the preparation is essentially the same. Overwhelmingly, physicians go for the gold standard.

Why don't the editors stop comforting CT manufacturers that are trying to make more money and recognize that traditional colonoscopy is the study of choice?

>-Richard Hamilton, M.D.
New York, NY

Related to this article

See the Real-World Impact of AI in Radiology
AI has to do more than show potential. It has to deliver measurable results.The Rad AI Outcomes and Market Impact Compendium brings together real-world clinical, operational and financial evidence from health systems, academic medical centers and radiology practices using Rad AI Reporting, Impressions and Continuity.Explore results including 60+ minutes saved per radiologist shift, a 47% reduction in report error rates, 70%+ patient follow-up adherence and >7x ROI — plus, case studies showing how organizations are translating AI into greater capacity, quality and financial performance.See what AI built specifically for radiology can deliver in practice.