Register Now: Image-Based Risk: The Next Frontier in Breast Cancer Screening
|Articles|November 28, 2006

CT reconstructions alone prove risky in cervical spine cases

Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, researchers said at an emergency radiology session at the RSNA meeting on Monday.

Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, researchers said at an emergency radiology session at the RSNA meeting on Monday.

An estimated 10,000 cervical spine fractures occur every year in the U.S., and early diagnosis is essential for minimizing damage. Multislice CT has proven far superior to plain film for clearing the cervical spine, as well as faster and cost-effective for those at risk of moderate to severe injuries.

Typically, axial images are obtained along with sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions. But some have questioned whether reconstructions suffice for diagnostic purposes in blunt trauma patients with suspected cervical spine fractures.

A new restrospective study conducted at the University of Maryland found very high specificity for reconstructed images alone at 98.1%, but sensitivity was just 75.6%.

"Reconstructed images alone cannot be used to detect cervical spine injuries with an acceptable degree of sensitivity," said Dr. Lisa Miller, an assistant professor of diagnostic radiology at Maryland, who presented the results.

The study looked at 104 consecutive abnormal blunt trauma cases plus 104 normal control cases seen within a 12-month study period in the emergency department. Three reviewers looked independently at the axial images plus reconstructions (15 sagittal and 20 coronal per case) performed on a 16-slice CT scanner. They recorded presence and location of injury if a fracture was detected. One month later, they analyzed the reconstructed images alone. Findings were compared with the radiology reports.

Of 312 fractures, 76 were missed on reconstructed images alone, according to Miller. The most common types of fractures missed were transverse process, isolated fracture of the C-1 arch, and fractures of the lamina.

Unstable fractures were also missed on the sagittal and coronal images, such as atlanto-axial dissociation and hyperextension injuries, she said.


Related to this article

See the Real-World Impact of AI in Radiology
AI has to do more than show potential. It has to deliver measurable results.The Rad AI Outcomes and Market Impact Compendium brings together real-world clinical, operational and financial evidence from health systems, academic medical centers and radiology practices using Rad AI Reporting, Impressions and Continuity.Explore results including 60+ minutes saved per radiologist shift, a 47% reduction in report error rates, 70%+ patient follow-up adherence and >7x ROI — plus, case studies showing how organizations are translating AI into greater capacity, quality and financial performance.See what AI built specifically for radiology can deliver in practice.