Revising a March 2022 recommendation, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said thyroid monitoring for young children three years of age and under receiving iodinated contrast media (ICM) in relation to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) can now be reserved for those with risk factors including prematurity, low birth weight or conditions affecting thyroid function.
Amending a previous recommendation of thyroid monitoring for all children three and under who received iodinated contrast media (ICM) in relation to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and intravascular procedures, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced the thyroid monitoring recommendation is now reserved for high-risk children in this age group.
Jonathan R. Dillman, M.D., MSc, co-authored an American College of Radiology (ACR) critique of the FDA’s previous March 2022 guidance that had recommended universal thyroid monitoring after ICM administration in the aforementioned pediatric population.
In a July 2022 video interview, Dr. Dillman emphasized that the available literature did not support universal thyroid monitoring for these patients. He noted there was a lack of prospective data and control groups in the majority of the 11 studies cited by the FDA in its March 2022 recommendation.
Most of the cited studies focused on high-risk pediatric patients ranging from neonates to those suffering from congenital heart disease, pointed out Dr. Dillman, the associate chief of research in the Department of Radiology and the medical director of the Imaging Research Center within the Division of Radiology at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
In the April 26, 2023 updated guidance, the FDA recommended that thyroid monitoring after injection of ICM in children three years of age or under “ … be individualized based on each child’s risk factors. These risk factors may include prematurity, very low birth weight, and underlying medical conditions affecting thyroid function.”
“I want to thank the FDA for thoughtfully reconsidering this matter and adopting a more patient-centered and tailored response consistent with scientific evidence presented by ACR experts,” noted Dr. Dillman in a recent statement from the ACR. “The FDA’s recent action allows us to proactively protect the at-risk children, while allowing those unlikely to benefit from the prior well-intended action to avoid unnecessary care, travel, expense, and concern.”
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.