Much is known about dose reduction and adult patients, but what about kids? The literature is scant, but that doesn’t mean solutions don’t exist, according to a presenter at the International Society for Computed Tomography conference May 21.
Much is known about dose reduction and adult patients, but what about kids? The literature is scant, but that doesn’t mean solutions don’t exist, according to a presenter at the International Society for Computed Tomography conference May 21.
The data on dose reduction is valid for adults and out of date for children, said Willi Kalender, Ph.D., director of the Institute of Medical Physics at the University of Erlangen in Erlangen, Germany.
For instance, the only established values for children, published by Shrimpton in 2004, did not take wide area detectors and overscanning effects into account.
Also, most dose calculations are based on phantoms, but the dose is higher for smaller body sizes, Kalender said.
“Dose estimates depend on conversion factors and have to be revisited,” he said.
Even though there are not a lot of data for pediatric patients, options to reduce radiation dose are still available. Kalender suggests:
He also emphasized the importance of lower kV values for contrast exams.
While dose values cannot be determined accurately for children, the magnitude can be estimated reliably, depending on the manufacturer, Kalender said. Radiologists can use the dose calculation tool found on modern scanners. The tool will create a number based on the standard person but the radiologist can estimate the radiation effects on a child.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Study Shows Enhanced Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Stenosis with Photon-Counting CTA
July 10th 2025In a new study comparing standard resolution and ultra-high resolution modes for patients undergoing coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT, researchers found that segment-level sensitivity and accuracy rates for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis were consistently > 89.6 percent.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.