Much is known about dose reduction and adult patients, but what about kids? The literature is scant, but that doesn’t mean solutions don’t exist, according to a presenter at the International Society for Computed Tomography conference May 21.
Much is known about dose reduction and adult patients, but what about kids? The literature is scant, but that doesn’t mean solutions don’t exist, according to a presenter at the International Society for Computed Tomography conference May 21.
The data on dose reduction is valid for adults and out of date for children, said Willi Kalender, Ph.D., director of the Institute of Medical Physics at the University of Erlangen in Erlangen, Germany.
For instance, the only established values for children, published by Shrimpton in 2004, did not take wide area detectors and overscanning effects into account.
Also, most dose calculations are based on phantoms, but the dose is higher for smaller body sizes, Kalender said.
“Dose estimates depend on conversion factors and have to be revisited,” he said.
Even though there are not a lot of data for pediatric patients, options to reduce radiation dose are still available. Kalender suggests:
He also emphasized the importance of lower kV values for contrast exams.
While dose values cannot be determined accurately for children, the magnitude can be estimated reliably, depending on the manufacturer, Kalender said. Radiologists can use the dose calculation tool found on modern scanners. The tool will create a number based on the standard person but the radiologist can estimate the radiation effects on a child.
Can CT-Based Deep Learning Bolster Prognostic Assessments of Ground-Glass Nodules?
June 19th 2025Emerging research shows that a multiple time-series deep learning model assessment of CT images provides 20 percent higher sensitivity than a delta radiomic model and 56 percent higher sensitivity than a clinical model for prognostic evaluation of ground-glass nodules.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.