Clinical history listed as "pain," no comparison studies provided, patient motion and suboptimal positioning limit diagnostic detail. Sound familiar?
STUDY TYPE: Noncontrast CT chest/abdomen/pelvis. Please note absence of enhancement impairs parenchymal assessment.
CLINICAL HISTORY: "Pain." (Please note lack of pertinent historical details may limit diagnostic accuracy.)
COMPARISONS: None provided. If reports, or preferably images, from previous studies can be supplied, interpretation will improve, and an addendum may be generated.
TECHNIQUE: Axial imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed. Coronal and sagittal reconstructions are not provided, and some pathology may therefore not be appreciated. Patient's motion and failure to suspend respiration limit diagnostic detail. There is also substantial beam-hardening from habitus and suboptimal positioning, with upper extremities not removed from the field of view. Upper margin of study does not entirely cover the thoracic apex. Lower margin of study partially excludes the pelvis and perineum. Artifact from patient's jewelry and metallic items in clothing (none of which have been removed for study) also limits visibility.
FINDINGS: Heart and major thoracic vasculature are grossly unremarkable on this non-gated study. Against the background of motion artifact, lungs are predominantly clear although tiny nodular densities and subtle pneumonitis are not reliably excluded. No bulky lymphadenopathy is seen but early metastatic disease could still be present.
Tiny hypoattenuating foci are questioned in liver, spleen, pancreas, and kidneys, nonspecific. Liver and spleen are prominent but this could relate to patient habitus. Borderline-thickening of the adrenals is indeterminate. Gallbladder is present, without definite pathology although this modality is limited for such determination. Ureters are not reliably followed and phleboliths are indistinguishable from small stones of the distal tract, bilaterally.
Bladder is nondistended and not reliably assessed. No appreciable uterine/adnexal pathology by this modality; consider ultrasound if clinically appropriate. Appendix not reliably seen, and much of bowel is decompressed; enteritis cannot be excluded. Small quantity of free pelvic fluid is seen, possibly physiological but potentially pathological. No definite free air, although small quantities are difficult to distinguish from gas in closely-adjacent bowel segments. Degenerative changes within the axial skeleton may be related to patient age and habitus but more significant arthropathy is possible. Radionuclide bone scan may be more reliable for metastatic assessment.
IMPRESSION: No definite pathology, allowing for some limitations mentioned above.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.