DICOM rookies, take heart. Researchers in the U.K. have developed a primer that demystifies the imaging standard and helps radiologists make the most of their soft-copy images.
DICOM rookies, take heart. Researchers in the U.K. have developed a primer that demystifies the imaging standard and helps radiologists make the most of their soft-copy images.
The advent of the DICOM file format enables digital images generated on various modalities to be stored and transferred with ease irrespective of equipment manufacturer. The complex array of image formats, however, can be bewildering to the uninitiated. The primer attempts to illuminate DICOM for users new to the standard who may be contemplating PACS for the first time (Clin Radiol 2005;60(11):1133-1140).
"Digital images can be manipulated in many ways and converted to different formats for teaching and publication purposes," said Dr. Richard N. Graham of the radiology department at John Radcliffe Hospital in Headington, U.K. "We outline a variety of ways in which radiologists utilize digital images and how to make the most of the capabilities of DICOM prior to the introduction of PACS."
The Radcliffe paper maps and explains the contents of the DICOM header, then discusses why it is often necessary to compress images before storage and transfer. The primer also examines the advantages and disadvantages of lossless and lossy compression techniques as well as a number of image file formats:
The DICOM standard emerged in response to the increased use of digital images in radiology. In 1983, the American College of Radiology and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association formed a committee to create a standard format for storing and transmitting digital images. The result was the original 1985 ACR-NEMA standard.
The standard was subsequently revised in 1993 and renamed Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine, or DICOM.
Recent improvements in Version 3.0 of DICOM permit transfer of digital imaging studies in a multivendor environment and, more important, facilitated the development of PACS.
Assessing MACE Risk in Women: Can an Emerging Model with SPECT MPI Imaging Have an Impact?
December 9th 2024In research involving over 2,200 women who had SPECT MPI exams, researchers found that those who had a high score with the COronary Risk Score in WOmen (CORSWO) model had a greater than fourfold higher risk of major adverse coronary events (MACE).