Radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to and could be lower than conventional two-view full-field digital mammography.
Radiation doses from digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to and could be lower than conventional two-view full-field digital mammography, show findings of a study published in the April issue of Radiology.
Researchers from Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Ga., compared dose levels of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) by using compressible water-oil mixture breast phantoms of varying sizes to determine how much radiation dose would be used for varying sizes and glandular compositions of breasts.
When comparing doses with the “average” breast (compressed thickness of 5 cm, 50 percent glandular fraction), a DBT acquisition resulted in 1.30 mGy, only an 8 percent higher mean glandular dose than the FFDM acquisition of 1.20 mGy. For a thicker breast sample (6.0 cm and 14.3 percent glandular fraction), a DBT acquisition was 2.12 mGy, which was 83 percent higher than an FFDM acquisition of 1.16 mGy.
RELATED: Practices Adjust Workflow IT for Tomosynthesis Adoption
Although the thicker breast had a higher dose, the researchers pointed out that this was still lower than the 3 mGy limit for a single-view conventional study, which is set by the Mammography Quality Standards Act.
Potentially, screening DBT could reduce the recall rate, reducing the number of repeat scans, which reduces women’s overall radiation dose rate.
Mammography News: FDA Grants Expanded 510(k) Clearance for AI-Powered SmartMammo Dx DBT Software
November 29th 2024Originally cleared by the FDA in 2021, the SmartMammo Dx software for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can now be utilized with the Senographe Pristina mammography systems from GE HealthCare.
Is the Kaiser Score More Effective than BI-RADS for Assessing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and MRI?
October 14th 2024For women with breast-enhanced masses, Kaiser scoring (KS) demonstrated a 20 percent higher AUC than BI-RADS classification for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and was comparable to KS for breast MRI.