A more personalized approach rooted in the patient’s needs is a better course of action.
X-rays should not be used to drive decisions about treating common forearm fractures, according to new research. Instead, providers should give more consideration to the patient’s needs and his or her environment.
In a study published June 17 in JAMA Network Open, researchers from Michigan Medicine reported results from a decade-long study that examined treatment outcomes for distal radius fractures. Based on their analysis, they determined that no one therapy works best for everyone.
At the core, though, they found that X-rays should not be the basis for these treatment decisions that impact more than 85,000 Medicare beneficiaries each year.
“Traditionally, surgeons look at these broken bones on X-rays, and they have to assess various ways of fixing it based off fracture anatomy and patient age,” said Kevin Chung, M.D., lead study author and Charles B.G. De Nancrede Professor of Surgery. “However, in older patients, we determined that the patient-centered care in tailoring particular treatments to their needs, social environment, and risk tolerance for surgery are all considerations in prescribing treatment.”
Related Content: AI System Detects Frequently Overlooked Fractures on X-ray
In this study, Chung’s team examined data collected over a decade from 187 individuals from 20 medical centers worldwide who underwent surgery for their fractures. The team divided participants into the groups based on their treatment: volar locking plates, external fixation, and pinning. An additional 117 patients refused surgery and opted for casting.
Initially, they said, patients who chose volar plating were better able to perform daily tasks, but after six months, their advantages over other treatment methods had faded. Additionally, after 24 months, all patients reporting similar pain scores with everyone reporting satisfaction with their outcomes.
“For hand surgery, this is the most intense, collaborative effort to try and answer a 200-year puzzle about distal radius fractures in older adults,” Chung said. “It is one of the most common fractures in the world for this population – you have parents and grandparents that will get this fracture. For the good of public health, we needed to answer this question.”
Ultimately, he said, the outcome of the study highlighted the importance of communication and interaction between the patient, his or her family, and the surgeon. By working together, they can identify the best personalized approach to fixing the patient’s broken bone and maximizing their future capabilities and quality of life.
For more coverage based on industry expert insights and research, subscribe to the Diagnostic Imaging e-Newsletter here.
Can AI Facilitate Improved Dual-Energy X-Ray Screening for Patients at High Risk of Osteoporosis?
June 28th 2024Out of 315 patients identified by artificial intelligence (AI) as being at high risk for osteoporosis, subsequent screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a randomized controlled trial revealed new-onset osteoporosis in 237 patients.
FDA Clears Mobile C-Arm Device Designed for Complex Vascular Procedures
June 17th 2024Offering a combination of intuitive user-friendly controls and enhanced imaging, the Zenition 90 Motorized C-arm reportedly facilitates workflow efficiencies and bolsters visualization for complex vascular procedures, cardiac interventions, and other clinical procedures.
Qure.ai to Debut Multimodality AI Platform for Lung Cancer Imaging at ASCO 2024
May 29th 2024In addition to detecting missed lung nodules on X-rays, the AI-powered Qure.ai lung cancer continuum platform reportedly automates lung nodule measurement on CT scans and facilitates multimodality reporting.