The extra radiation inherent in new CT technologies has made more urgent the need for strategies to reduce exposure. Two recently published studies address the issue of dose reduction with the latest generation of 64-slice and dual-source scanners.
The extra radiation inherent in new CT technologies has made more urgent the need for strategies to reduce exposure. Two recently published studies address the issue of dose reduction with the latest generation of 64-slice and dual-source scanners.
Modulating tube current is one way of controlling radiation dose. But tube current modulation cannot be selected manually when the scanner is fitted with an automated tube current modulation program. This could become an issue when trying to perform a particularly low-dose examination, such as a chest CT of a young woman.
Investigators at the University of Washington's radiology department led by Kalpana M. Kanal, Ph.D., assessed the relationship between image noise, slice thickness reconstruction, and radiation dose on a 64-slice scanner featuring automated tube current modulation. Kanal and colleagues relied on a phantom to gauge dose levels produced by several image noise and slice thickness settings. They developed a "noise index" spreadsheet and graph that display the noise/slice thickness/dose relationship. The device could help radiology departments figure out proper doses. Although results apply only to the GE LightSpeed CT scanner used in the study, they could be used to develop similar tools for other models (AJR 2007;189[1]:219-225).
Taking another tack, Mayo Clinic researchers led by Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D., compared the dose performance of 64-slice and dual-source CT scanning for ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. McCollough and colleagues used a 64-slice and a dual-source CT scanner from the same manufacturer (Siemens) and an anthropomorphic phantom for measurements. They found that dual-source CT with a temporal resolution of 83 msec can perform ECG-gated coronary CTA with similar image noise and lower radiation doses than a 64-slice CT. Results, however, were mostly based on the assumption this temporal resolution fits all heart rates (Radiology 2007;243[3]:775-84).
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.