Most radiologists are eligible for the meaningful use program, says Keith J. Dreyer, DO, PhD. So don’t be tempted by the hardship exemption.
Meaningful use, the federal government’s incentive program for electronic health records, can seem like a complex evolving program. But this is clear: an overwhelming majority of radiologists are eligible and it’s a worthy effort.
“It’s very achievable for radiologists,” Keith J. Dreyer, DO, PhD, FACR, FSIIM, chair of the ACR IT and Informatics Committee-Government Relations Subcommittee and radiology vice chair at Massachusetts General Hospital, said in an interview after his presentation last week at the American College of Radiology’s Imaging Informatics Summit. “While you can look at the hardship exemption, I don’t recommend you do it.”
Dreyer was referring to the significant hardship exemption included in Stage 2 of Meaningful Use. This allows radiologists, as well as anesthesiologists and pathologists, can apply for exemption from penalties if they have significant difficulty meeting the requirements.
Despite this concession, radiologists for the most part don’t seem to be tempted by this provision, Dreyer said. The exemption is really intended for radiologists in a hospital setting, for example, where the facility doesn’t have the technology or plans to invest, or radiologists who practice is a lot of facilities.
Michael Peters, ACR’s legislative and regulatory affairs director, noted that this exemption is only for five years, and is subject to annual review. “It’s only a temporary reprieve of the penalties,” he said.
Instead, radiologists should be gaining as much information on the program as possible, Dreyer said. Initial confusion over radiologists’ inclusion in the program has been cleared up, and several organizations are working hard to provide radiologists with updates. First, radiologists should determine if they are eligible, then figure out how to comply, Dreyer said during a panel discussion.
“There are no cookie cutter solutions,” he said. “You have to ask the questions and see what works for you.”
For more on what Stage 2 means for radiologists, check out this video interview with the ACR's Michael Peters:
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.