In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
New research presented at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) suggests that preoperative use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) offers a key advantage over mammography with respect to detection of multifocal masses.
For the study, researchers compared preoperative CEM and mammography in 69 patients (average age of 55.8) with breast cancer confirmed via biopsy or cytology.
The study authors found that CEM detected 92.3 percent of multifocal masses in contrast to 58.3 percent for mammography.
Here one can see the use of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to detect breast cancer in a 45-year-old woman. In a recent study presented at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR), researchers found that preoperative use of CEM detected 34 percent multifocal masses than mammography. (Images courtesy of Radiology.)
“(Contrast-enhanced mammography) is a valuable, cost-effective alternative to MRI for assessing tumors before surgery, particularly in preoperative staging and the identification of multifocal lesions,” wrote lead study author Marina Balbino, M.D., who is affiliated with Foggia University in Foggia, Italy, and colleagues.
(Editor’s note: For related content, see “New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection,” “Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection” and “How Does Hormonal Regulation Impact Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography?”)
While preoperative CEM underestimated the size of lesions in 28 cases compared to 21 cases for mammography, the researchers noted no significant difference between CEM and histological measurements. The study authors pointed out that histology findings revealed mass-like neoformations in over 49 percent of the cohort.
“(Contrast-enhanced mammography) showed high diagnostic accuracy in preoperative staging, supporting its use over MRI, particularly due to its lower cost, faster acquisition time, and better patient tolerance,” noted Balbino and colleagues.
Reference
1. Balbino M, Masino F, Montatore M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in preoperative staging of breast tumors: a comparative study with histology and mammography. Presented at European Congress of Radiology (ECR), February 26-March 2, 2025, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.myesr.org/congress/ . Accessed February 28, 2025.
Considering Breast- and Lesion-Level Assessments with Mammography AI: What New Research Reveals
June 27th 2025While there was a decline of AUC for mammography AI software from breast-level assessments to lesion-level evaluation, the authors of a new study, involving 1,200 women, found that AI offered over a seven percent higher AUC for lesion-level interpretation in comparison to unassisted expert readers.
SNMMI: Botox May Facilitate Relief from Dry Mouth Side Effect of PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals
June 25th 2025For patients being treated with radiopharmaceutical agents for metastatic prostate cancer, the combination of botulinum toxin and an anti-nausea patch led to a 30 percent reduction in PSMA uptake in the salivary glands, according to preliminary research findings presented at the SNMMI conference.
Could an Emerging PET Tracer be a Game Changer for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
June 23rd 2025In addition to over 90 percent sensitivity in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the glypican-3 (GPC3) targeted PET tracer 68Ga-aGPC3-scFv appeared to be advantageous in identifying HCC tumors smaller than one centimeter, according to pilot study findings presented at the SNMMI conference.