Assessing radiologists with and without cardiac training when reading chest CT.
Cardiac training should be encouraged for evaluation of cardiac findings on chest CT without electrocardiographic gating, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA, sought to evaluate the diagnostic ability of radiologists with different levels of cardiac training to identify cardiac findings on chest CT without electrocardiographic gating compared with a reference standard of electrocardiographically gated cardiac CTA.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"47809","attributes":{"alt":"Cardiac imaging","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_4827810731146","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5665","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 107px; width: 160px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©hywards/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The researchers retrospectively identified findings from electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT angiographic studies performed between January 2005 and January 2010 in patients with routine chest CT within six months. Fourteen radiologists performed blinded, anonymized cardiac readings of chest CT images: four were in stage 1 (residents with no cardiac training); three in stage 2 (residents who had completed at least one dedicated rotation of cardiac imaging; three in stage 3 (radiologists without cardiac training); and four in stage 4 (radiologists with formal cardiac fellowship training). They categorized their findings as coronary arterial, noncoronary vessel, cardiac chamber, myocardial, pericardial, and valve findings, with cardiac CTA as a reference standard.
The results showed that overall, 140 cardiac CT angiographic findings were reported in 63 of 77 patients:
Increasing training was associated with higher sensitivity, but similar specificity:
Categories of frequently missed findings were coronary arterial, myocardial, and cardiac chamber findings, the researchers noted.
“Increasing cardiac imaging training correlates with increased sensitivity and stable specificity to detect cardiac findings on routine chest CT without electrocardiographic gating,” the authors concluded. “Cardiac findings should be noted on chest CT when observed, and cardiac training should be encouraged.”
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.