Emergency C-spine studies require full set of images

Article

Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, according to researchers at the University of Maryland.

Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, according to researchers at the University of Maryland.

An estimated 10,000 cervical spine fractures occur every year in the U.S., and early diagnosis is essential for minimizing damage. Multislice CT has proven far superior to plain film for clearing the cervical spine. It is also faster and more cost-effective for moderate to severe injuries.

Typically, axial images are obtained along with sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions. But some have questioned whether reconstructions alone suffice for diagnostic purposes in blunt trauma patients with suspected cervical spine fractures.

A new retrospective study conducted at the University of Maryland found very high specificity for reconstructed images alone at 98.1%, but sensitivity was just 75.6%.

"Reconstructed images alone cannot be used to detect cervical spine injuries with an acceptable degree of sensitivity," said Dr. Lisa Miller, an assistant professor of diagnostic radiology at Maryland, who presented the results during a session on emergency radiology at the 2006 RSNA meeting.

The study looked at 104 consecutive abnormal blunt trauma cases plus 104 normal control cases seen within a 12-month study period at the Shock Trauma Center. Three reviewers looked independently at the axial images plus reconstructions (15 sagittal and 20 coronal per case) performed on a 16-slice CT scanner. They recorded presence and location of injury if a fracture was detected. One month later, they analyzed the reconstructed images alone. Findings were compared with the radiology reports.

Of 312 fractures, 76 were missed on reconstructed images alone, according to Miller. The most common types of fractures missed were transverse process, isolated fracture of the C-1 arch, and fractures of the lamina.

Unstable fractures were also missed on the sagittal and coronal images, she said.

When all three sets of images (axial, sagittal, and coronal) are used to make a diagnosis, radiologists have three opportunities to pick up fractures. But with reconstructions only, they look at the data just twice. Also, some fractures are more clearly seen on axial images.

"Undoubtedly, as software improves, our ability to make the diagnosis on 2D or even 3D images will improve. We are just not there yet," Miller said.

Recent Videos
Improving Access to Nuclear Imaging: An Interview with SNMMI President Jean-Luc C. Urbain, MD, PhD
SNMMI: 18F-Piflufolastat PSMA PET/CT Offers High PPV for Local PCa Recurrence Regardless of PSA Level
SNMMI: NIH Researcher Discusses Potential of 18F-Fluciclovine for Multiple Myeloma Detection
SNMMI: What Tau PET Findings May Reveal About Modifiable Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease
Emerging Insights on the Use of FES PET for Women with Lobular Breast Cancer
Can Generative AI Reinvent Radiology Reporting?: An Interview with Samir Abboud, MD
Mammography Study Reveals Over Sixfold Higher Risk of Advanced Cancer Presentation with Symptom-Detected Cancers
Combining Advances in Computed Tomography Angiography with AI to Enhance Preventive Care
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.