Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, according to researchers at the University of Maryland.
Relying on CT multiplanar reconstructions alone to pick up cervical spine fractures in blunt trauma patients is too risky, according to researchers at the University of Maryland.
An estimated 10,000 cervical spine fractures occur every year in the U.S., and early diagnosis is essential for minimizing damage. Multislice CT has proven far superior to plain film for clearing the cervical spine. It is also faster and more cost-effective for moderate to severe injuries.
Typically, axial images are obtained along with sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions. But some have questioned whether reconstructions alone suffice for diagnostic purposes in blunt trauma patients with suspected cervical spine fractures.
A new retrospective study conducted at the University of Maryland found very high specificity for reconstructed images alone at 98.1%, but sensitivity was just 75.6%.
"Reconstructed images alone cannot be used to detect cervical spine injuries with an acceptable degree of sensitivity," said Dr. Lisa Miller, an assistant professor of diagnostic radiology at Maryland, who presented the results during a session on emergency radiology at the 2006 RSNA meeting.
The study looked at 104 consecutive abnormal blunt trauma cases plus 104 normal control cases seen within a 12-month study period at the Shock Trauma Center. Three reviewers looked independently at the axial images plus reconstructions (15 sagittal and 20 coronal per case) performed on a 16-slice CT scanner. They recorded presence and location of injury if a fracture was detected. One month later, they analyzed the reconstructed images alone. Findings were compared with the radiology reports.
Of 312 fractures, 76 were missed on reconstructed images alone, according to Miller. The most common types of fractures missed were transverse process, isolated fracture of the C-1 arch, and fractures of the lamina.
Unstable fractures were also missed on the sagittal and coronal images, she said.
When all three sets of images (axial, sagittal, and coronal) are used to make a diagnosis, radiologists have three opportunities to pick up fractures. But with reconstructions only, they look at the data just twice. Also, some fractures are more clearly seen on axial images.
"Undoubtedly, as software improves, our ability to make the diagnosis on 2D or even 3D images will improve. We are just not there yet," Miller said.
Emerging AI Algorithm Shows Promise for Abbreviated Breast MRI in Multicenter Study
April 25th 2025An artificial intelligence algorithm for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI offered a 93.9 percent AUC for breast cancer detection, and a 92.3 percent sensitivity in BI-RADS 3 cases, according to new research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Can Abbreviated Breast MRI Have an Impact in Assessing Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response?
April 24th 2025New research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference suggests that abbreviated MRI is comparable to full MRI in assessing pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Clarius Mobile Health Unveils Anterior Knee Feature for Handheld Ultrasound
April 23rd 2025The T-Mode Anterior Knee feature reportedly offers a combination of automated segmentation and real-time conversion of grayscale ultrasound images into color-coded visuals that bolster understanding for novice ultrasound users.