False-positive screening mammograms may correspond with a higher risk of developing breast cancer.
Women with false-positive screening mammograms have a higher risk of a breast cancer diagnosis later on, according to a study published in Radiology.
Researchers from Spain performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of breast cancer in women who had received false-positive screening results, according to radiologic classification of the features seen on mammography.
The cohort study included 521,200 women (aged 50 to 69), who underwent screening as part of the Spanish Breast Cancer Screening Program between 1994 and 2010 and who were observed until December 2012. False-positive results were defined as a screening mammogram with a BI-RADS score of 3, 4, 5, or 0. A total of 76,075 women in this cohort had false-positive results.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"46754","attributes":{"alt":"mammography","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_7988900435941","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"5444","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 120px; width: 180px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©zlikovec/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
The results showed that the age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of women with false-positive results was 1.84, compared with those women who had negative mammograms. The risk was higher among women who had calcifications, whether the calcifications were associated with masses or not. “Women in whom mammographic features showed changes in subsequent false-positive results were those who had the highest risk,” the authors wrote.
“Women who had more than one examination with false-positive findings and in whom the mammographic features changed over time had a highly increased risk of breast cancer,” they concluded. “Previous mammographic features might yield useful information for further risk-prediction models and personalized follow-up screening protocols.”
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Mammography Study: AI Facilitates Greater Accuracy and Longer Fixation Time on Suspicious Areas
July 8th 2025While noting no differences in sensitivity, specificity or reading time with adjunctive AI for mammography screening, the authors of a new study noted a 4 percent higher AUC and increased fixation time on lesion regions.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and High-Concentration ICM Dosing: What a New Study Reveals
June 16th 2025New research showed a 96 to 97 percent sensitivity for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with an increased iodine delivery rate facilitating robust contrast enhancement for women with aggressive breast cancer.