FDA hears debate on digital mammo status

Article

Testimony heard by a Food and Drug Administration medical device committee on March 6 encouragedoptimism among advocates of full-field-of-view digital mammographywho fear the FDA will delay the new technology`s introductionin the U.S. market. The

Testimony heard by a Food and Drug Administration medical device committee on March 6 encouragedoptimism among advocates of full-field-of-view digital mammographywho fear the FDA will delay the new technology`s introductionin the U.S. market.

The advisory committee, chaired by Dr. Francine Halberg, convenedto solicit guidance on the FDA's proposal to regulate the full-viewdigital breast imagers as class-three devices. The designationwould require that manufacturers submit premarket approval applications(PMAs) in order to sell the devices in the U.S. (SCAN 1/18/95).

Unlike the 510(k) equivalency process that pertains to makersof film-based mammography systems, PMAs require original clinicalresearch to demonstrate efficacy and safety. FDA 510(k) clearanceusually take a few months, while PMAs often take several yearsbefore the agency rules on the application.

"The industry's position is that a 510(k) will suffice,and we came away from that meeting feeling that's the directionthe panel is leaning toward as well," said Vicki Schofield,industry manager of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association,the equipment vendors' trade group.

Panelists identified a need for additional study, but concludedthat the intensive field research typically undertaken for a PMAis not essential, Schofield said.

Included among several proposals was a plan to limit the initialclinical use of full-view digital mammography to diagnostic breastimaging, Schofield said. Regulatory approval for screening applicationscould come after clinical testing has been reviewed.

"The type of research discussed seemed reasonable,"Schofield said. "Population sizes for these studies shouldbe in the hundreds of patients, not the thousands. The time frameis measured in months, not in years."

An exact accounting of what the discussion means will cometo light when the FDA publishes a proposed protocol for publiccomment in the Federal Register, Schofield said. A timetable forthat step has not be disclosed, but a decision is expected soon,according to the FDA.

Recent Videos
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.