Full field digital mammography, performed instead of screen film mammography, finds fewer interval breast cancers.
The switch to full field digital mammography (FFDM) has changed the mammographic presentation of interval breast cancer, with fewer interval cancers presenting in association with microcalcifications, according to a study published in the European Journal of Radiology.
Researchers from Ireland sought to assess the impact of FFDM on the classification of interval breast cancers and to compare the mammographic features of interval cancers at FFDM and screen film mammography (SFM).
The researchers looked at 76 cases of interval breast cancer following FFDM screening and 62 following SFM screening. Five consultant breast radiologists assessed prior screening mammograms. The review classified cases as missed, minimal signs, occult, or true interval breast cancer. Mammographic features of the interval cancer at diagnosis and any abnormality identified on the prior screening mammogram were recorded.
The results showed that there was not much difference between FFDM and SFM for missed cancers, but there were significantly fewer interval cancers presenting as microcalcifications following SFM.
The interval breast cancers did not show up as frequently with FFDM, so this can be problematic, concluded the researchers.
Mammography and Breast MRI: Is it Time to Evaluate Strategies as Opposed to Modalities?
July 5th 2024The combination of mammography with breast MRI within 90 days had a 96.2 percent sensitivity in comparison to 48.1 percent for mammography and 79.7 percent for breast MRI performed within 91 to 270 days after index mammography, according to newly published research.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.